 |
|
Topic started on 23-10-2005 @ 03:59 PM by ikillaliens
|
external image
tell me what this is sumone?
[edit on 10/25/2005 by Amorymeltzer]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-10-2005 @ 04:02 PM by ikillaliens
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-10-2005 @ 08:01 PM by TevashSzat
|
well..... my first reaction was to scream fake,but if it is,its the best one ive seen or maybe im going blind  hounestly its either a photoshop
fake(which is what i think) or this is the strangest photo ive seen.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-10-2005 @ 08:14 PM by ikillaliens
|
its a real weird one cant be a reptilian ...this is the supposed of what one looks like
www.iwasabducted.com...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-10-2005 @ 08:28 PM by Dulcimer
|
This is the image you wanted to post.
external image
While I dont remember seeing this photo before, im sure others have.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-10-2005 @ 08:40 PM by hatchedcross
|
Maybe it is a real live demon being summoned!!!
Or it could just be a picture of an odd flame?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-10-2005 @ 08:45 PM by Dulcimer
|
Originally posted by hatchedcross
Or it could just be a picture of an odd flame? 
Hmm I never thought of that. It does sort of look like that.
What was the point of taking this photo anyways? Its just a dark mess. Oh that's right... reptilians................
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-10-2005 @ 10:32 PM by GrOuNd_ZeRo
|
I have seen this pic before, the figure is too bizarre, too strange to be a hoax, they would have a more convincing humanoid form that could actually
be seen, this is not a hoax...IMHO
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-10-2005 @ 02:41 AM by Musclor
|
Hello
I agree with GrOuNd_ZeRo, i know this photo since a long time, and i think it is genuine. But it's hard to prove it of course. Just a feeling.
One more photo, with which i'm convinced of its authenticity, is the one taken during the
Ilkley Moor Encounter of the Third Kind.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-10-2005 @ 04:22 AM by Reptilian_Queen
|
external image
This image from the link of that picture is proof positive Reptoids exist.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-10-2005 @ 06:21 PM by TevashSzat
|
you know it looks like a fire elmental.  but i dont think its reptillian it could be something spiritual instead of ET.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-10-2005 @ 06:41 PM by pineappleupsidedown
|
I think it is interesting that Lynn Taylor would put her name on the website. "Adrian" was only a friend who received the photo, and even he
disappeared. Yet she is posting these same images in a public place and posting her name for all to see.
a bit brave, and I am surprised this website would still be up 6 years later if the military wanted to keep it quiet.
---Pineapple
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-10-2005 @ 10:26 PM by start_the_peace
|
ha I think if you look at the head like its a helmet and the being is facing towards the left part of the picture and the thing coming down to the
side looks like an arm you might just laugh
but yea, I'm thinking that it is just a human, maybe naked, maybe not, but it looks like there is an arm there and maybe the head is actually hair,
how they got it to look the way it does, the orange color to it, i dunno, but look at all the crazy things people are doing with computers and
pictures these days, there has to be an explanation, and do we even have a valid description of a reptilian(im not being sarcastic im seriously
asking) becuse if you think of an alien you probably think of a grey, well thats because so many people have claimed to see them and have claimed that
they all look the same, how many people have claimed to have seen a repitilan and do their descriptions of it match up with other peoples description
of a repitilian?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-10-2005 @ 02:06 AM by adamneldon
|
I checked it out on my computer and all of the images on that site have been photoshopped. Even the "original". I am gonna have to go with fake.
It is a cool pic though.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-10-2005 @ 04:13 AM by defcon5
|
Looks like a picture of a rapidly spinning firework of some type (like several blackjacks). Note the ribbed look and the blur. The Blur is obviously
from motion, and the ribs from something spinning like when you photograph someone waving a sparkler really fast, especially if you hold the shutter
open for longer then normal.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-10-2005 @ 07:07 AM by Khali
|
I know these pictures.
Amazing, that the ratios and linings of the head of this creature is very similar to that Reptilian head in the other picture. Also, that creature
seems to be a predator, like any flesh eating creature. Cats, leopard, tiger also has spots like this one, perfectly suitable for daytime and night
hunting.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-10-2005 @ 07:22 AM by JIMC5499
|
Looks like someone left their Poloroid camera in the sun or in a hot car too long and the film overheated. The image it self looks like a naked
person trying to cover up their groin area with one hand and taken with the above mentioned bad film. Things like this are one of the reasons why
Poloroid instant film never really caught on with serious photorgraphers.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-10-2005 @ 07:34 AM by lepracornman
|
it looks like it has scaley arms or legs whatever those liney things look like but who ever took this picture has no follow up on what else they saw
so it seems a little dodgey
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-10-2005 @ 08:17 AM by Musclor
|
Originally posted by adamneldon
I checked it out on my computer and all of the images on that site have been photoshopped. Even the "original". I am gonna have to go with fake.
It is a cool pic though. 
Hello
"Photoshopped" does not means faked. It could have been edited with Photoshop for numerous reasons, as to reduce the size or improve brightness or
contrast for example. The "Photoshop" mark has no value for me.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-10-2005 @ 09:00 AM by Khali
|
What if "they" gave us both pictures? Just think about it. Both of them have an unknown source, no interview on CNN, nobody came forward with any
information, nobody has a phone number or address to reach , just to ask: Did you make this picture?
Only people with special mind can see the reality behind these photos, convntional people only see a simple hoax in them. But they are way too amazing
to be made by people or by coincidence.
Being put together with the Lacerta File, it all adds up. But I am way too sure that Lacerta has not been interviewed at all, she made that file to
show something interesting to people who think the same way as her. Well, I can actually understand her, she is a cool creature, I guess some ppl will
see her in person as a Reptilian, not as a human girl.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |