It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
WetWarez
There is a huge difference between 'concept' and reality. NASA hasn't even come out with a budget for expected costs as most of the money for launches have been eaten up by the crippled shuttle program.
Do you honestly believe that with the current political environment and the situation that we've gotten ourselves in in the Middle East that the Congress would actually consider the funding requirements?
Right now, anything that the current administration can do to deflect public attention from Iraq is what their main goal is. I mean the reality is that the current successful missions that have occured (i.e. Mars, Saturn, Jupiter) were funded and approved well before this administration.
Don't get me wrong, I am not 'Politicizing' this thread but find that the financial backing for such a project weak at best.
And as far as sub-orbital space craft are concerned, look at Virgin Galactic. They are on the cutting edge and privatly owned.
We will colonize and explore beyond earth, but I don't think NASA is the one to lead us there....
Originally posted by wetwarez
Come on, do you honestly believe that you can keep thousands of backyard astronomers quiet all over the world? After all, they are the ones that usually find the NEO objects.
Originally posted by Murcielago
Yes, I do. The Iraqi rebuilding is expensive...but by no means will it halt our space program.
deflect??? Is everything really about Iraq with you? Nasa has launched dozens and dozens of probes during the Nush administration. You are obviously anti-bush, you should stick to the politics forum if this is all you keep coming back to.
a couple of billion.... what do you want? 2 more shuttle launches?
... I believe all Nasa needs is an increase in there annual budget of a couple billion.
yeah...thats my point, america is pushing towards a public space flight future...and not just for nasa of the really wealthy. I like Virgin Galactic...but I wouldn't call them cutting edge by any means.
Originally posted by Murcielago
As for the Nasa projects under the Bush admin...how about the grand daddy of em all, the CEV, made for the ISS, and the moon.
Originally posted by Murcielago
that question sounds like what "resistance" kept asking...he gave me a head ache...I'll dig up that thread later and link it.