This topic is in the H5N1 Avian Flu Issues discussion forum.  (rss)


Mandatory Avian Flu Vaccines?




Topic started on 18-10-2005 @ 06:31 PM by RogerKint


If, and it's a big if, there is a pandemic of avian flu, will there be mandatory vaccines, and if so, should citizens accept them?

There is debate in the thread here about the influence of vaccines on diseases.

Further, with theories of AIDS being spread through government-enforced vaccinations, can we trust the powers that be on matters of health, especially vaccine-related?

Israel stocks up on vaccine
EU response
Discussion of avian flu vaccine

The Strecker Memorandum- US gov't and AIDS
William Cooper on AIDS
Kissinger, Rockefeller, AIDS, and Depopulation



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-10-2005 @ 08:38 PM by Amethyst


According to this site, it was vaccines more than the flu that killed so many in 1918.

Not to mention that the vaccines today have mercury in them!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-10-2005 @ 02:48 AM by RogerKint


Mercury in the vaccines... flouride in the water... what a world.

Here is more on the coming mandatory vaccines...
Bush on flu vaccines
The US vaccine buildup

Great article on what a modern quarantine would look like



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-10-2005 @ 03:10 AM by fingapointa


Australia's talking about vaccinating the entire country for avian flu. eek.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-10-2005 @ 07:14 AM by Watchman77


I don't understand why they are making such a big deal about this flu, from my understand it has only killed 60 people in over a year, annual flu kills more than that each year.
It seems to me they are trying to get people to freak out so there is no questions asked when mandatory vaccinations start.
What I am curious about is, are they going to use the re-created 1918 flu to make the new vaccines, isn't this how they make many vaccines?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-10-2005 @ 07:44 AM by phixion


A lot of things have changed since 1918 and I'm sure vaccinations are far more safer now than they were.

In reply to Watchman, the big deal is that its only killed 60 people over the last year but has the potential to kill so many more. Think of the plague, it was spread by rats, now imagine the same kind of disease but it's spread by rats with wings, now that's scary.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-10-2005 @ 07:21 PM by Relentless



Originally posted by fingapointa
Australia's talking about vaccinating the entire country for avian flu. eek.


Well, first they have to come up with one now don't they? IF they did I don't think they would have to make it mandatory, enough people would come running for it. More likely they would not have enough for the number of people that want it. IF they come up with one in the first place.

As for those who refuse......I would think they would just not give a you know what about the few that pull that stunt, they can only infect each other, but the vast majority would take it willingly.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-10-2005 @ 11:30 PM by fingapointa




Well, first they have to come up with one now don't they?



yeah, that's what I thought. The mutation hasn't happened (yet) and they need that to work out the vaccine don' they?


Britain To Give Bird Flu Shots To Entire Population
www.abovetopsecret.com...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:































ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.079 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread