It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
These are the reasons:
- The U.S. State Department determined in August 2005 that "Iran is in violation of its CWC [Chemical Weapons Convention] obligations because Iran is acting to retain and modernize key elements of its CW infrastructure to include an offensive CW R&D capability and dispersed mobilization facilities."
- According to the CIA, "Iran likely has already stockpiled blister, blood, choking, and probably nerve agents – and the bombs and artillery shells to deliver them – which it previously had manufactured."
- According to (then undersecretary for arms control and international security, now U.S. ambassador to the UN) John Bolton's testimony to the House of Representatives (June 24, 2004), "We believe Iran has a covert program to develop and stockpile chemical weapons," and on Iran's ballistic missiles, "Iran continues its extensive efforts to develop the means to deliver weapons of mass destruction," and "The 1,300-km range Shahab-3 missile is a direct threat to Israel, Turkey, U.S. forces in the region, and U.S. friends and allies."
- In the IAEA resolution of Sept. 24, Iran was found to be in "noncompliance" with its NPT safeguards agreements.
- Members of the Israeli parliament from across the political spectrum are urging the United States to stop Iran's nuclear programs, or Israel will "act unilaterally." Statements of grave concern about Iran's nuclear program have been made by Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz, Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom, and Mossad chief Meir Dagan (Iran poses an "existential threat" to Israel). Shin Bet chief Avi Dichter accuses Iran of plotting relentlessly to attack Israeli targets.
- According to the head of the Russian Atomic Energy Organization, Alexander Rumyantsev, Russia will ship the first cargo of nuclear fuel for Iran's Bushehr's reactor at the end of 2005 or early 2006.
- Israel bombed Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor (which was under IAEA supervision) in 1981 just before nuclear fuel was loaded into it (to prevent nuclear fallout).
- President Bush has said that "all options are on the table" if diplomacy fails to halt Iran's nuclear program.
- The U.S. House of Representatives on May 6, 2004, by a vote of 376-3, called on the United States to use all appropriate means to deter, dissuade, and prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.
- In the recently released draft document "Doctrine for Joint Nuclear Operations", the Pentagon states that it will respond to the threat of WMD (which includes chemical and biological weapons) with nuclear weapons.
Conclusion:
According to Israel, the U.S. administration, and 99.2 percent of the U.S. House of Representatives, Iran will not be allowed to have access to any nuclear technology. No diplomatic options to achieve that goal will remain when Russia and China veto Security Council sanctions, or if the IAEA refuses on Nov. 24 to refer Iran to the Security Council. Military action will occur before Russia ships uranium fuel to Iran, and will inevitably lead to the use of nuclear weapons by the U.S. against Iran.
How will it all get started?
No matter how much Bush and Cheney want it, the U.S. Senate is unlikely to authorize the bombing of Iranian installations out of the blue. Unless there is some major disturbance in Iraq that can be blamed on Iran, Israel is likely to pull the trigger. It knows how to and has every motivation to do so.
Once the U.S. enters the conflict, 150,000 U.S. troops in Iraq will be at risk of Iranian missiles with chemical warheads, or of being overrun by Iran's conventional forces streaming into Iraq. According to the Pentagon planning, nuclear weapons will be used:
- "To demonstrate U.S. intent and capability to use nuclear weapons to deter adversary use of WMD."
- "Against an adversary using or intending to use WMD against U.S., multinational, or alliance forces or civilian populations…"
- "[O]n adversary installations including WMD, deep, hardened bunkers containing chemical or biological weapons or the C2 infrastructure required for the adversary to execute a WMD attack against the United States or its friends and allies"
- "[T]o counter potentially overwhelming adversary conventional forces…"
- "For rapid and favorable war termination on U.S. terms…"
- "To ensure success of U.S. and multinational operations…"
That makes six independent reasons for nuking Iran.
- Let Iran pursue a civilian nuclear program. Over 30 countries have civilian nuclear programs, while only nine have nuclear weapons. Let the Nobel-prize winning IAEA and Mohamed ElBaradei do their job!
- The U.S. can guarantee Israel's safety by assuring Israel that any threat to its existence from a non-nuclear nation will be met with the full force of U.S. conventional forces, and any threat from a nuclear nation will be met with U.S. nuclear forces.
- If Iran were to withdraw from the NPT and not allow international supervision of its programs, it would still take several years for it to acquire a nuclear weapon. There would still be plenty of time to act.
Originally posted by Souljah
So why is the US NOT disarming Isreal
The U.S. can guarantee Israel's safety by assuring Israel that any threat to its existence from a non-nuclear nation will be met with the full force of U.S. conventional forces
. There would still be plenty of time to act.
Why are they so eager to start a Conflict with Iran?
One Proof More that Isreal has a Special Place in Hearts of American Politicians
I sincerly Hope that Diplomacy will Win in the Case of Iran
Let the Nobel-prize winning IAEA and Mohamed ElBaradei do their job!
Originally posted by Dronetek
Have you guys ever seen the movie "The Day After"?
Its a movie about nuclear war and its effects on a small midwestern town. The war starts pretty much the exact same way in the movie.
Originally posted by American Mad Man
Firstly, the US would know in advance that Isreal would strike Iran. Thus, they would be ready for the counter attack by Iran. The US would surely beef up heavy armor, troop numbers, and air assets in the region to completely destroy any Iranian invasion attempt.
Originally posted by Dronetek
Have you guys ever seen the movie "The Day After"?
Its a movie about nuclear war and its effects on a small midwestern town. The war starts pretty much the exact same way in the movie.
Originally posted by Bootyac
Im 38,I grew up in the tale end of the cold war,frankly I am getting tired of all the rumors of nuclear war.
To this day I still have horrific night mares about nuclear war.Cold sweats,wake up screaming ect..
I am starting to just wonder if its nothing more than some threat to keep the citizens paraniod and under its thumb?
Originally posted by Bootyac
Im 38,I grew up in the tale end of the cold war,frankly I am getting tired of all the rumors of nuclear war.
To this day I still have horrific night mares about nuclear war.Cold sweats,wake up screaming ect..
I am starting to just wonder if its nothing more than some threat to keep the citizens paraniod and under its thumb?