posted on Oct, 21 2005 @ 06:59 PM
so in order to prove the pictre is fake you would have to verify that the 'prop' was created before the picture was taken.
Um yeah, okay, I've done some research on this (did you read my post directly above yours). It's been debunked on coast to coast a very pro ufo
show it's been debunked on at least three other sights and Don Post Studios has been credited with making the actual alien photo in the black and
white picture that started this thread.
I really don't know what else you want, if you need this photo as your proof then you're in for dissapointment. It's a Don Post Prop, why don't
you call up Don Post Studios and ask them yourself, I think I've put in enough effort to prove it's not a true alien. If you don't believe it's
fake then I suggest you do some research and prove to us it's real.
But I've realised with this like this people believe what they need to, I believe in extraterrestrials, I believe in aliens and I believe that this
photo happens to be fake because I've been doing this for a long time and have read more than enough from other sights that I can confidently say
that among researchers who believe in aliens and researchers who don't believe in aliens seem to agree that this particular photo is not of a dead
alien but a prop.
I would also say that camera angle and quality of photos could make the one alien appear slightly different than the other, but with burn marks in the
exact same place, identical ribbing and arm length your going to have to do better than that.
[edit on 10/21/2005 by Spiderj]