It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Is it possible that US uses terrorism in its favor?

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 15 2005 @ 10:48 PM
link   
First it was the British, now US soldiers are impersenating insurgents to plant car bombs etc.? These stories seemed to dissolve in matter of seconds from the headlines, when I beleieve there is reason to suspect a "Bay of Pigs," type of motives. Are we using these sinister tactics now? And how deep does this go? All the way back to 9/11 perhaps? Why does the finger not get pointed? Is there not one person with a public voice see this? Or am I dillusional? It's one of the two, I'm almost sure of it!




posted on Oct, 16 2005 @ 04:53 AM
link   
UK troops do not comit acts or terrorism.
Period.



posted on Oct, 16 2005 @ 05:03 AM
link   
..........you're just now coming to this conclusion?



posted on Oct, 16 2005 @ 05:06 AM
link   
What the hell are you talking about?!?



posted on Oct, 16 2005 @ 05:10 AM
link   
Follow the money. It is always about money and never about what is expressed in public.



posted on Oct, 16 2005 @ 05:50 AM
link   
False propaganda is always powerful. But it does not work in the end.


Iraqis have already many times blamed the coalition forces of delibertaly planting bombs and causing chaos in Iraq.

The motives can be so many.

Iraqi people also claim that even the police are targeted by the allies to eliminate moles who spy on US forces.

The public in the west is repeatedly told that "insurgents" are killing their own fellow citizens. Iraqis are not blaming any of their own insurgents.




[edit on 16-10-2005 by mr conspiracy]



posted on Oct, 16 2005 @ 09:38 AM
link   
devilwasp are you a member of clan lox?

oh and your comment is true for 90% of the British troops. The SAS have always carried out such operations.



posted on Oct, 16 2005 @ 01:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by BANGINCOLOR
..........you're just now coming to this conclusion?


I have to agree, to a certain extent, but everyone I know would never even think it. other than that I agree with BANGINCOLOR.



posted on Oct, 17 2005 @ 04:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by Britman
devilwasp are you a member of clan lox?

Yup, head of its intel division.


oh and your comment is true for 90% of the British troops. The SAS have always carried out such operations.

The SAS has NEVER commited false flag operations, they are not suited for the job and are not trained to do those ops.



posted on Oct, 17 2005 @ 05:44 AM
link   
UK denies storming Iraqi jail to free soldiers
British forces have freed two undercover soldiers from jail in Basra after a day of rioting in the Iraqi city that was sparked when the soldiers fired on a police patrol.

ATSNN: Captured British Agents Were On A Spy Mission

The newspaper said Britain's Special Air Service (SAS) had been staking out several members of the Iraqi police, who were suspected of torturing prisoners at the notorious Jamiyat prison in Basra.

AR MY'S TOP ABUSE COP KILLS HIMSELF IN IRAQ
THE Army officer in charge of investigating abuse of civilians by British forces in Iraq has been found dead, it was revealed yesterday. Royal Military Police Captain Ken Masters, 40, is believed to have killed himself. His body was found on Saturday evening.

Britain "apologizes" for terrorist act in Basra
BRITAIN will pay compensation for injuries and damage caused during the storming by the army of a police station in Basra in the operation to release two SAS soldiers held by local Iraqi militia, it was announced yesterday.

UK agrees to pay for Basra damage
The UK Government is willing to pay compensation for the casualties and damage caused in Iraq when two British undercover soldiers were freed.

Pay-outs and a suicide sounds like guilt to me.

[edit on 17-10-2005 by Regenmacher]



posted on Oct, 17 2005 @ 03:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by Regenmacher
UK denies storming Iraqi jail to free soldiers
British forces have freed two undercover soldiers from jail in Basra after a day of rioting in the Iraqi city that was sparked when the soldiers fired on a police patrol.

ATSNN: Captured British Agents Were On A Spy Mission

The newspaper said Britain's Special Air Service (SAS) had been staking out several members of the Iraqi police, who were suspected of torturing prisoners at the notorious Jamiyat prison in Basra.

AR MY'S TOP ABUSE COP KILLS HIMSELF IN IRAQ
THE Army officer in charge of investigating abuse of civilians by British forces in Iraq has been found dead, it was revealed yesterday. Royal Military Police Captain Ken Masters, 40, is believed to have killed himself. His body was found on Saturday evening.

Britain "apologizes" for terrorist act in Basra
BRITAIN will pay compensation for injuries and damage caused during the storming by the army of a police station in Basra in the operation to release two SAS soldiers held by local Iraqi militia, it was announced yesterday.

UK agrees to pay for Basra damage
The UK Government is willing to pay compensation for the casualties and damage caused in Iraq when two British undercover soldiers were freed.

Pay-outs and a suicide sounds like guilt to me.

[edit on 17-10-2005 by Regenmacher]

No its simply them trying to make ammends, But take it as you want.
Its your opinion and people will only judge what they think about you from it.



posted on Oct, 17 2005 @ 03:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by Regenmacher
UK denies storming Iraqi jail to free soldiers



I think you will find that they actualy freed them from a private residence and not jail.

If the British troops had not acted as they did, then we would have seen two more people beheaded on national Arab TV.

Most of the story is here.
Take a look, it makes good reading for the most part..............



posted on Oct, 17 2005 @ 05:27 PM
link   
Devilswasp,

Just because you don't know doesn't make it untrue. Truman didn't know about the Manhattan Project until three weeks before he decided to drop them. It is called a "need to know" basis, and it just looks like the head of intel didn't need to know!



posted on Oct, 17 2005 @ 10:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by devilwasp
No its simply them trying to make ammends, But take it as you want.
Its your opinion and people will only judge what they think about you from it.


Just eat your crow pie, stop spreading disinfo, and apologize to the others.

BRITAIN - 'SORRY FOR BOMBMAKERS’?

The Scotsman reported: "Britain will pay compensation for injuries and damage caused during the storming by the army of a police station in Basra in the operation to release two SAS soldiers held by local Iraqi militia." The article added, "In a joint statement, the British Consulate General, representing the army, and the Provincial Council of Basra expressed 'regret' for the incidents on 19 September. 'We also regret the casualties on both sides and the material damage to public facilities,' the statement said. 'The British government is prepared to pay valid claims for compensation for casualties and material damage.'"


How Basra Slipped Out of Control: Portent in the Shiite South?

The basic facts of the anti-British uprising in Basra have been well documented. On September 19 Iraqi police arrested two British military intelligence agents disguised as Arabs. The British command went to the police station where they were being detained to demand their return. Rebuffed by the police there, it took the law into its own hands, using armoured vehicles to break down the wall of an Iraqi government police compound in order to free the two prisoners.


Britain "apologizes" for terrorist act in Basra

In earlier reports, we focussed on the operation of two undercover British SAS operatives, dressed in traditonal Arab clothing, who were planning to set of bombs in the main square in Basra, coinciding with a religous event.


British Chief Police Investigator in Basra dies under mysterious circumstances

The two British undercover "soldiers", who were driving a car loaded with weapons and ammunition, were subsequently "rescued" by British forces, in a major military assault on the building where they were being detained:

"British forces used up to 10 tanks " supported by helicopters " to smash through the walls of the jail and free the two British servicemen."

The incident, which resulted in numerous civilian and police casualties has caused political embarrassment.

Several media reports and eyewitness accounts suggested that the SAS operatives were disguised as Al Qaeda "terrorists" and were planning to set off the bombs in Basra's central square during a a major religious event.

On the 14th of October, Britain formally apologized to Iraq and confirmed that it "will pay compensation for injuries and damage caused during the storming by the army of a police station in Basra in the operation to release two SAS soldiers" (The Scotesman, 15 Oct 2005). In the British raid on the prison, 7 Iraqis were killed and 43 were injured .(The Times, op cit)


Now back to our regular program:
Is it possible that US uses terrorism in its favor?

Anyone dig up something that points to DoD using terrorism?



[edit on 17-10-2005 by Regenmacher]



posted on Oct, 17 2005 @ 10:23 PM
link   
Ragenmaker,

Somebody just got punked!!!



posted on Oct, 18 2005 @ 04:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
Devilswasp,

Just because you don't know doesn't make it untrue. Truman didn't know about the Manhattan Project until three weeks before he decided to drop them. It is called a "need to know" basis, and it just looks like the head of intel didn't need to know!

No but netheir does it make it true, you want to make that your opnion ok, but people will judge you by it.



posted on Oct, 18 2005 @ 04:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by Regenmacher
Just eat your crow pie, stop spreading disinfo, and apologize to the others.

BRITAIN - 'SORRY FOR BOMBMAKERS’?

The Scotsman reported: "Britain will pay compensation for injuries and damage caused during the storming by the army of a police station in Basra in the operation to release two SAS soldiers held by local Iraqi militia." The article added, "In a joint statement, the British Consulate General, representing the army, and the Provincial Council of Basra expressed 'regret' for the incidents on 19 September. 'We also regret the casualties on both sides and the material damage to public facilities,' the statement said. 'The British government is prepared to pay valid claims for compensation for casualties and material damage.'"


How Basra Slipped Out of Control: Portent in the Shiite South?

The basic facts of the anti-British uprising in Basra have been well documented. On September 19 Iraqi police arrested two British military intelligence agents disguised as Arabs. The British command went to the police station where they were being detained to demand their return. Rebuffed by the police there, it took the law into its own hands, using armoured vehicles to break down the wall of an Iraqi government police compound in order to free the two prisoners.


Britain "apologizes" for terrorist act in Basra

In earlier reports, we focussed on the operation of two undercover British SAS operatives, dressed in traditonal Arab clothing, who were planning to set of bombs in the main square in Basra, coinciding with a religous event.


British Chief Police Investigator in Basra dies under mysterious circumstances

The two British undercover "soldiers", who were driving a car loaded with weapons and ammunition, were subsequently "rescued" by British forces, in a major military assault on the building where they were being detained:

"British forces used up to 10 tanks " supported by helicopters " to smash through the walls of the jail and free the two British servicemen."

The incident, which resulted in numerous civilian and police casualties has caused political embarrassment.

Several media reports and eyewitness accounts suggested that the SAS operatives were disguised as Al Qaeda "terrorists" and were planning to set off the bombs in Basra's central square during a a major religious event.

On the 14th of October, Britain formally apologized to Iraq and confirmed that it "will pay compensation for injuries and damage caused during the storming by the army of a police station in Basra in the operation to release two SAS soldiers" (The Scotesman, 15 Oct 2005). In the British raid on the prison, 7 Iraqis were killed and 43 were injured .(The Times, op cit)



Crow pie?
Yeah disinformation is such a lovely word to through around, ever though to consider that you and I are both spreading disinformation for 2 diffrent sides and mabye we're are actually spreading INFORMATION but heh since I'm a bad guy I'm always spreading "disinformation.".
Apologizing for otheres?
I take it that my post was somehow apologizing for what MY country men done?
Guess you see what you want to see...


Now back to our regular program:
Is it possible that US uses terrorism in its favor?

Its possible, the US has the power and means.


Anyone dig up something that points to DoD using terrorism?
[edit on 17-10-2005 by Regenmacher]


Depends on your definition of terrorism.



posted on Oct, 18 2005 @ 07:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by devilwasp
UK troops do not comit acts or terrorism.
Period.


What do you call shooting an innocement man on the subway 9 times?

You can call it whatever you want, but at the bottom of it, its just as bad, only on a smaller scale.

But of course they are, they have been using it to their advantage since that fatefull day in September.



posted on Oct, 18 2005 @ 12:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by ekul08
What do you call shooting an innocement man on the subway 9 times?

A mistake made by SO19, BTW if you read up about this unit you will see they are not called in lightly.


You can call it whatever you want, but at the bottom of it, its just as bad, only on a smaller scale.

Yeah it was bad, nothing good comes from killing.


But of course they are, they have been using it to their advantage since that fatefull day in September.

Uh what?
UK troops had no involvement with 9/11 and If I remember correctly bush knew about it.



posted on Oct, 18 2005 @ 12:54 PM
link   
Not just the U.S., maybe better classified as the Western world. I would have to say without a doubt. The name is "agent provocateurs". This war has to justified somehow.

www.iranfocus.com...

Tehran, Iran, Oct. 17 – An individual arrested in connection with Saturday’s twin bombings in the south-western city of Ahwaz has confessed to have received British training in Iraq to carry out the attacks, the Iranian Majlis (Parliament) deputy for the oil-rich city announced on Monday.

“The arrested individual is a deceived person who received the necessary training in Iraq”, Nasser Soudani told the Fars news agency, close to the office of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

“Foreign agents, led by treacherous and criminal Britain, have trained teams in Iraq to create insecurity and an air of fright and terror in the province of Khuzestan”, Soudani said, referring to the ethnic Arab-dominated province whose capital is Ahwaz.

Saturday’s twin bombings in a central Ahwaz shopping centre left at least six people dead and over 100 injured.

Soudani said that two British intelligence agents arrested last month in the southern Iraqi city of Basra had ties to both the bombings on Saturday and a similar spate of bombings in the volatile city earlier in June.

British officials have said that the pair were MI5 agents working to uncover Iranian support for the insurgent attacks against British troops in southern Iraq.

Iranian officials and state-run press have been advertising the idea that Britain was behind Saturday’s bombings, a charge denied by the British embassy in Tehran. On Sunday, hard-line Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad told the state-run ISNA news agency that he suspected British involvement in the attacks. “We are very suspicious about the role of British forces in perpetrating such terrorist acts”, Ahmadinejad said



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join