Of course, then they are going to have to admit and explain why all the UFO sightings for the last 50 years have been allowed to stand as
legitimate ET sightings...
I have a hard time believing that, on its own, the USA could develop antigravity technology while other countries could not. If such technology is
entirely home grown and based on ideas dreamt up by humans, then, certainly, the Russians could have, in time, duplicated or re-created the same
technology... And, even if the US kept Russia away from its work, the Russians, on their own, would have, in time, developed such technology.
D-R has brought up, before, things like the Townsend-Brown experiments... And, so, I guess it's reasonable for the USA to have developed a
non-aerodynamic based form of flight by the late 50s.. But, that being said, surely the Russians could have equaled such a feat by the 70s.
Now, you might argue that both sides DID, in fact, develop this stuff... Well, historically, when both sides in a conflict develop revolutionary
technologies, the principles of which are no longer mutually secret, they reveal such tech to the public... with the hope that the private sector can
further develop such tech.
So:
1.Starting from the same point, the USA and Russia would both eventually develop anti-gravity technology, though there might be a time delay between
the two.
2.Russia does not have antigravity technology, otherwise its firms would be pulling the rug from under Boeing and Lockheed
3Therefore: The USA and Russia DID NOT start from the same point. That is, the USA had 'help' from somewhere else.
This 'help' could be in the form of direct aid from aliens or recovered wreckage from a crashed alien craft (IE Roswell, 1947). Without such
'help', it is unthinkable that the USA would be the only society that could develop antigravity propulsion. There would either have been a
diffusion of these ideas or an independent rediscovery of them.