AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Board Business & Questions discussion forum.  (rss)


Question for the Mods.




Topic started on 13-9-2003 @ 06:59 PM by falcon


Now that I have a scanner I can take copys of some of the older material that I have and post it on ats one of the things that I want to post in the plans for eletromagnetic propulsion this is also called Electro gravity drives. In order to make sure that I dont have to go threw too much trouble in resizing them I need to know the max as a far as size they can be. The sooner I find out the sooner I can start scaning and uploading the plans so people can see how to make these engines.

These are also used in some of the x model craft that are out there.

Thanks.

Falcon.



   copyright & usage 
Click here for more Board Business & Questions topics
Hot Topics   |   Top Topics   |   This Week   |   Subscribe   |   Home


reply posted on 13-9-2003 @ 07:44 PM by ktprktpr


I'm no mod but I bet this board doesn't have any explicit size limitations. It's just a picture. I wouldn't go over 2046x2046, though. You could also host them somewhere and just link to them. There is a max file size limit on uploading.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-9-2003 @ 07:48 PM by SimonGray


I wouldn't recommend making a topic solely containing large graphical files, not so much because of the physical dimensions but because of the file size which will likely be an issue for users on slower Internet connections.

If you are going to give a sort of "running commentary" for the different scans, perhaps you can do as ktprktpr said and host the image but just link to it.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-9-2003 @ 03:22 AM by Satyr


I agree, but for a different reason. I think links should be posted to large images. If they're posted with the IMG tag, they screw up the entire thread and everyone has to scroll 3 miles to read it.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 15-9-2003 @ 11:16 AM by Gazrok


I agree, but for a different reason. I think links should be posted to large images. If they're posted with the IMG tag, they screw up the entire thread and everyone has to scroll 3 miles to read it.


I completely agree. Another idea may be to include smaller versions of the pics in the post, and then link to the large versions of the pic....



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-9-2003 @ 11:28 AM by Djarums


As Simon mentioned there are still people who use slower internet connections and you have to keep them in mind while posting Images. For example, instead of posting a bitmap (which tend to be larger), post a jpeg. Also, unless there is some sort of fine detail that you insist be seen, shrink it. You can use the Microsoft Photo Editor to take an existing image and shrink it down by pixel. All you have to do is go to "Image > Resize" and then change it to something a little more friendly. Posting or linking to a picture that's 5mb is going to really cause issues for people on dialup so use caution when picking what images to put up.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-9-2003 @ 11:33 AM by falcon


Thanks I will upload them in the future to ats or some other website and keep them as small as possible. Your cd was sent today 7 to 10 days it will be there.

Falcon



   copyright & usage 





















































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.026 seconds
6 total database queries (1)

(:)








The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownershipwho maintains
strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.






It looks like you're using some kind of software designed to block advertising while surfing our site.

We work very hard to provide an efficient Internet presence that services over 200,000 daily visits from people and automated web spiders. A large web site like this, that can handle that amount of traffic, is increasingly expensive to operate. Our only viable source of revenue (for now) are the ads displayed on each page.

If you enjoy our content, please enable our domain in your ad-blocking package.

more information       contact us

[hide this message]