It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Prodicaliforniason
The point ICR was making was that if in fact carbon dating was acurate then explain how the "materials" they found were older near the top
So having sea shells in the middle of the desert doesn't make you think for a second?
An evolutionist who thinks that nothing plus nothing equals something. You mean that only some monkeys evolved into humans, but what about the ones at the zoo?
Furthermore, the rocks aren't and can't be carbon dated because they were never alive.
That is defiantly not a natural rock formation.
Originally posted by Essan
Next he'll be discovering the resting place of Harry Potter's Broomstick and prove it by revealing it was powered by an anti-gavity engine..............
The Noah story is a garbled version of an earlier Mesopotamian myth, possibly based on a severe storm during Flandrian Trangression around 5-6kya
All Wyatt has found is a well known rock formation.......
Originally posted by Grailkeeper
Could all of the events concerning Noahs Ark have actually happened but only on a much smaller scale? These people were not world travellers so their perception of the world could be alot less grand than it known today.
Might there have been a flood which would cover the Earth (their perception) in which Noah was instructed to build an ark and house all the animals ( again, their perception of all the animals of the Earth which could have been limited to just the surrounding area) ?
Mind you.... I still do not have anything to offer in regards to the floating around for 40 days and 40 nights, bad shrooms perhaps