It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Cruizer
If the F-19 exists that's fine and dandy but please note that every F designation does NOT end up in a viable, in-service aircraft. Where are the F-21, F-24, F-25, F-26?......you get the idea.
Originally posted by Cruizer
Guys you're misunderstanding me. I don't care whether the F-19 exisits or not. My original point was and still is that simply because there is a missing F number doesn't mean something sinister.
Right! In case anyone is intrested here a quick list of SOME of the other missing "F" designation in the current series in the US:
F-1
F-2
F-9
F-13
Originally posted by Cruizer
The F-1 as in the North American Fury was the in service company designation not an official Air Force designation. It was a derivitive of the F-86 in that numbering system that lasted a few more decades. Same for F-2 and F9F. The F-4, F-5 and F-8 are NOT part of the new fighter numbering changeover.
Originally posted by Cruizer
The F-1 as in the North American Fury was the in service company designation not an official Air Force designation. It was a derivitive of the F-86 in that numbering system that lasted a few more decades. Same for F-2 and F9F. The F-4, F-5 and F-8 are NOT part of the new fighter numbering changeover. They are in company designations. The Vought F-8U was the original designation. You may remember the Vought F-4U Corsair from WW 2 that also had no relation to the current numerical sequences.
The F-111 was the last of the old system save for the F-117 which was so designated before the F-15 and F-16 came about. F-14 is a Grumman # thing not the government. They basically dropped dropped the 1st of the 3 digits so the F-115 became the F-15 and so on.
There were no officially designated fighters F-1 to F-13.
Originally posted by Cruizer
There were no officially designated fighters F-1 to F-13.
Originally posted by Cruizer
While the 1954 Northrop in-house project designation of the N-156F is valid, its official designation in service of F-5 has nothing to do with it going by the "new" numbering system. It couldn't since it was a contemporary of the F-100 under the old system that began in 1925 with the P-1. "P" for pursuit.
Being more explicit I mean the F-14 is so named by the naval sequence of designations. Instead of 'government' I meant Air Force as it has nothing to do with their sequencing. To Grumman in-house it was the G303. It's just a coincidence that it is a relative contemporary of F-16s and F-15s serving at the same time.
The F-117 designation was earmarked as such when it was in the idea and concept stage at a time of the 1925 sequences.
Under the OLD system the F-15 would have been the F-115 is what I was attempting to convey.
The descriptions of the "F-19" also were very misleading regarding how to shape a stealth aircraft, with lots of round curves, which wasn't practical then.
the F-5 project was commenced in 1954 at a time when current fighters like the F-100, F-104, F-105, F-106 were flying. Since the F-5 vwas conceived as an export figher under the Military Assistance Program it was never intended as a front line US machine- hence the different designation. If the F-111 flew in 1964 under the old designation, after the F-5 in 1962 how is the F-5 in the new system since it was a MAP design?
New Designation/ Old Designation
North American F-1/ Fury North American FJ Fury
McDonnell F-2 Banshee/ McDonnell F2H Banshee
McDonnell F-3 Demon/ McDonnell F3H Demon
McDonnell F-4 Phantom II/ McDonnell F4H Phantom/F-110 Spectre
Douglas F-6 Skyray/ Douglas F4D Skyray
Convair F-7 Sea-Dart/ Convair F2Y Sea Dart
Vought F-8 Crusader/ Vought F8U Crusader
Grumman F-9 Cougar/ Grumman F9F Cougar
Douglas F-10 Skyknight/ Douglas F3D Skyknight
Grumman F-11 Tiger/ Grumman F11F Tiger
I am simply not satisfied that it was anything more than a one off designation for a plane the USAF never originally intended to use in inventory.
Originally posted by johnlear
The Navy F-19, currently still in use, of which 62 airplanes were built and the airplane in which Gen. Bonds was killed in (not the MiG 23 which was a disinfomration story) had a bat wing, rounded edge form. Thanks.
The Mig was and still is a part of a Top Secret Technical Intelligence program. It's not even officially supposed to be in the US. Why would it be used as a cover story for something else?
Sorry, but I have to agree with Firepilot on this one!
Tim