It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
Yeah, this is one of the reasons I find it hard to believe a TR-3A exists, as it 'apparently has' curved features, and surely it would have been designed in a similar time-period to the F-117 (??) Unless it was the trial for the new design process?
Originally posted by American Mad Man
Well, the F-117 was the first attempt at a RCS stealth aircraft. By the time that the F-117 was finished, the computing power had matured enought to allow for curved surfaces to be used. Basically, assuming that the TR-3A exists, it most likely would have been designed more so in line with the B-2 then the F-117.
As for NG having better technology then Skunk Works...
I am sure they have fields where they would be considered the "leaders" and there would be others where Skunk Woks would be the leaders. As it happens though, I have read in several places that the reason the NG B-2 ATB was chosen over Lock-marts was that it utilized the high voltage leading edge technology (blanking on the technical term). I guess in that case the USAF wanted to see that technology developed. Funny enough, perhaps this was a precurser to the technology that would be utilized in this?
Originally posted by Browno
Also if Northrop Grumman have more advanced technology then Lockheed Martin then why does Northrop get turned down all the time?.
Maybe TOO advanced things are TOO hard to repair or maintain? or could be just ahead of our time.
[edit on 12-11-2005 by Browno]
Oh yes, I have seen that painting before on the bunkertours site.
Originally posted by waynos
Yeah, the plane on the left is based on some Lockheed ATF artwork from the 80's, the original version has been published in a few books.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
Yeah, this is one of the reasons I find it hard to believe a TR-3A exists, as it 'apparently has' curved features, and surely it would have been designed in a similar time-period to the F-117 (??) Unless it was the trial for the new design process?
*Oh, and I assume you mean Northrop had more powerful computers at their disposal, and not 'more advanced technology than Lockheed', it kinda could read as a slight on Lockheed.
You have voted ghost for the Way Above Top Secret award.
You have two more votes this month.
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
You have voted ghost for the Way Above Top Secret award.
You have two more votes this month.
Thank goodness for at least some people understanding the political and economic -- as well as technical -- reasons for a weapons platform's existence.
At MD/Boeing, I worked on the YF-23 proposal -- which lost. I worked on the JSF proposal -- which lost. And I even worked on the McDonnell Douglas AHX proposal -- which lost to that gold-plated dog, the RAH-66.
I participated in a lot of wins, too, which means I still have a job and a pension coming up Real Soon Now.
An aircraft -- or any other major defense system -- does not lose because it is the technically inferior offering. It loses because the customer determines that it is not what they wanted, i.e., it does not fulfill the customer's needs.
And the cost, logistical, and political aspects of a major defense system are every bit as important -- and, in the totality, even more important -- than the systems technical and warfighting capabilities.
Ghost seems to have figured that out.
Originally posted by rmatrem
Here i'll name a few: U-2 (U?), A12/SR-71, Boeing Bird of Prey did that even have a designator?, CL-400, D-21/M-21, Have Blue,... do I have to say F-117... Oh here is a good one! CL-282 & MX2147 (Bald Eagle).. blah blah blah
Originally posted by Browno
Although the F-19 is fake, here are some nostalgic cold war era adverts:
www.nostalgica.nu...
Originally posted by InSecreto
I believe the F19 exists, under the name F119D, the US is still hiding too much from the public. I will update this post later.
Originally posted by InSecreto
I believe the F19 exists, under the name F119D, the US is still hiding too much from the public. I will update this post later.
Originally posted by DanS
www.bunkertours.co.uk...
This links to a picture painted on the wall of a US Airbase. Could be someone being inventive… Could be more. You guys have probably seen it before though.
Dan