Originally posted by AnarchistSuperstar
You seem pretty desperate in your attempt to defend yout theological beliefs. Too bad you dont have any evidence to support them except imaginative
speculation. Anyways, who says the universe cant be infinite? Time is infinite.
Anyways, how about 3.) It always existed. Circles end where they begin. Think of the universe as a flower wilting in the winter and blooming again
in the summer. For instance, George Bush supporting the \"Forest Thinning Initiative.\" to stop forest fires. Using the logic that: \"Fire
needs material to burn, remove that material and it cant burn.\" Negating the fact that we\'ve destroyed over half of our worlds rain forest
already, let us contemplate the importance of this stupidity, forest fires are a natural part of nature, the cycle of destruction and construction
although insentient.
The universe has complex attributes to it. But to claim a deity exists because of the fact that you arent aware of enough evidence to support a
universe that wasnt created by some one named \"bob\" or what have you... Essentially, because you\'re ignorant you feel thats justification for
the belief in deities. That doesnt cut it with me.
The so called logic of a theist states that: "Who creates each precious, beautiful and unique snowflake?" Do people honestly want and expect an
answer like "Bob. Bob did It." Well, it wasnt Bob, it was Nature. We have everything to thank to nature. Too bad nature isnt sentient or
cognitive. And you know what? Nature isnt even omnipotent! Awesome.
[Edited on 13-9-2003 by AnarchistSuperstar]
Ah...yes, the ole' logical, analytical, skeptical approach.....
Amounts to conjecture, postulation and personal judegements and conclusions.
Personally dude......I believe what I believe...and thats in God, and you don't. The thing is, you presented the case that God doesn't exist and
have YET to empirically prove that, in fact, He does not.....go figure.
Believe what you will, but to tell me that what I believe is foolish or unfounded is about as unfounded as your own beliefs are.
"If believeing in God is irrational, is NOT believing in God rational?"
I don't think so, but to each his own...right?
Your postualtion is still not valid nor empirical....nothing but a unproven premise and a belief. An atheist believes in nothing....but yet to
believe in nothing, he/she must believe in just that...nothing.
regards
seekerof