It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The leadership in Beijing is deeply concerned there could be a wider backlash, threatening a decade of strong economic growth and the Communist Party's grip on power, says Wenran Jiang, a China expert at the University of Alberta.
"They have come to the conclusion that ... the regime will not survive if they don't address the growing wealth gap, and more importantly, the perception that the government only cares about economic growth and the urban rich," he said.
The newspaper of the Communist Party's premier cadre training ground, the Central Party School, reported recently that the wealth disparity had reached the "yellow" warning level and could become a "red" danger within five years.
"Social contradictions" are on the rise, it warned.
Average urban incomes last year were 9,400 yuan while rural income was 3,000 yuan
According to the Guangdong newspaper Yangcheng Wanbao, a recent survey held by NBSC revealed that similar to the large gap in incomes between the country's urban and rural areas, a sharp gap in incomes among urban citizens now also exists. The highest-income group in cities earns 10.7 times more than those at the other end of the scale.
Activist Lu Banglie was taking a journalist into a village known for its budding democracy movement when their journey was brutally halted by a group of men
They pointed flashlights at us, and when the light hit Lu's face, it was as if a bomb had gone off. They completely lost it. They pulled him out and bashed him to the ground
Originally posted by The Middle Kingdom
I am honored to have been invited to comment, mr subz, and sadly I'm not an economic expert and bodebliss one journalists bad luck doesn't account for any economic problems whether imagined or otherwise.
Originally posted by The Middle Kingdom
Its not just a matter of raising the taxes of the rich, its also a matter of how the budget is balanced between helping the poor and helping industries flourish.
Since most citizens who'ld be considered rich are those reinvesting a vast amount of profit back into the economy, and money received from the trade surplus.
Originally posted by The Middle Kingdom
As for parallels, there is some similarity but also a wide gap because America is deliberately trying to widen the gap, the People's Republic of China is trying to shorten it but recent economic growth is hard to slow down and redirect to helping the poor.
Originally posted by The Middle Kingdom
Also there's the matter that a large percentage of China's population is rural in nature with however a large increase in urban growth but America is mostly urban with government subsidized/corparate farms.
I could be wrong, is there any sources to confirm the American percentage of rural farmers and urban spral?
Originally posted by The Middle Kingdom
Back to China's rural farmers, as I said no agricultural taxes and government investment is a big help, but rice primarily being a labour intensive crop requires many workers to farm it and the wages earned or profits earned are small in comparison to fruit and vegetable farming which is more mechanical in nature and provides a far greater yield of personal profit for the average farmer but... doesn't supply as much food, and as we know with 1.2-3 billion people China has alot of mouths to feed, we could feed ourselves but it'ld be hard and thus we are forced to import food for the sake of living conditions.
Originally posted by The Middle Kingdom
As for America if America keeps bastardizing (right word?) its poor and abusing them delliberatly I see either a large growth in independant parties or some more democrat presidents and possibly large cuts to the military.
Originally posted by The Middle Kingdom
Also if the PRC manages with its 11th 5 Year Plan "next five years to persist in putting people first, change the concept of development, create a new development mode, improve the quality of development, carry out the "five balances" (balancing urban and rural development, development among regions, economic and social development, development of man and nature, and domestic development and opening to the outside world)" to change the development mode to something more benfitial to the rural areas then I see Washington going to become very embarrased if the "ChiComms out did them" and some politicians probably tarred in feathered which I'm surprised that the West does such things to its leaders, I hope its a figure of speach.
Originally posted by The Middle Kingdom
As for America deliberately trying to upset the Chinese people by investing in us, I seriously doubt that considering the incompetence in recent US leadership and the fact that your whole global strategy seems to change every 4-8 years.