It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The National Post, Saturday, 8 October 2005, p. A19:
Why Are Aliens So Boring?
The folklore of the 20th-century produced nothing more absurd,
yet nothing more persistent, than the belief that creatures from
other worlds habitually visit Earth, kidnap a few humans and
then return them, apparently unhurt, to their homes. The alleged
human victims later describe their experiences in what scholars
of alienography call 'abductee narratives'. These sound like
tales told by idiots, but no one who cares about the popular
imagination can be entirely indifferent to them.
Abductees report that some aliens say they are bringing world
peace and others announce that their mission is war. But a
strikingly high percentage appear to be carrying out a peculiar
assignment, raiding the reproductive systems of their victims to
collect DNA. 'My eggs were taken,' one typical abductee
reported, and another said, 'sperm was sucked from my penis by a
machine.'
CONTINUED>> www.virtuallystrange.net...
Originally posted by AlexofSkye
As a Post subscriber, I read the article yesterday morning over coffee. I can understand why the true believer would be upset with the article, but I found it to be well written and discusses some very important points.
First, setting aside whatever "facts" you think the author is ignoring, the UFO community does need to address why there is such a variety of reports and evident motives, if the stories are true. Why such inconsistency?
Second, despite over 50 years of modern UFO incidents (and perhaps hundreds of years before that), there is still no good, hard evidence of the phenomena out before the public. Why not? And please don't say its all been hidden by the authorities. Maybe, but I can't evaluate it.
Third, there is no question that the field has become rife with phonies, charlatans and madmen over the years. Combine that with the lack of hard proof, and you should not be surprised at the prevailing skepticism.
I'm old enough to have followed the UFO story for over 40 years, since I was a teenager. While I still do, frankly my attitude has become like that of many others weary of the same old, same old: I'll believe it when an Alien representative appears on Larry King Live.
Extraterrestrials must be far smarter than we are (they
travel distances our scientists can barely imagine) so anyone
even mildly curious will wonder what they want with a
substandard planet's genetic material.
She asks why
mentally superior aliens haven't anything better to do than hang
around North America stealing our genes. 'Why are these genius
aliens so dim?' she asks. 'After fifty years of abducting us,
why are they still taking the same bits and pieces? Don't they
have freezers?'
Clancy discovered that abductees share certain characteristics.
They are not crazy, but they score high on a schizotypy test,
which doesn't mean they are schizophrenic but suggest they have
a weakness for fantasy and for thinking related to magic. Most
of them believed in flying saucers before they were abducted.
Originally posted by resistance
I also believe the Military is breeding humans to these aliens, because they are able to materialize and we know from Scripture that Nephilim were mating with humans in the days before Noah. And Scripture also says that in the last days things will be as they were in the days of Noah.
So where does the article go wrong?
[edit on 16-10-2005 by resistance]
Originally posted by resistance
Thanks, Ram. I feel about the same way you do. But I thought 2012 was the end of the world, not the start of the beginning of the end. I think we're going to see the NWO any day now. It's going to happen fast. Probably a superstorm or just some big calamity the Illuminati is trying to engineer to give them an excuse to impose the police state.
Originally posted by 4for4
In case I lost a few of you: If aliens are really abducting people to experiment on them, and doing it as part of a large scale organised operation YOU WOULDN'T SEE THOSE PEOPLE AGAIN. Why let them go home and tell all about it?
I believe the similarity in many abduction reports can be explained by fantasy and suggestive ideas. Case study: Person wakes up feeling odd in the morning, maybe after having a nightmare and accidentally hitting themselves in the nose, causing it to bleed. They've seen a documentary about UFOs and abductions recently on TV, and get a bit nervous. They start to look up stuff about nose-bleeds, feeling odd in the mornings. They find out more about alien abductions. They start to think "Wow, my nose was bleeding and I don't know why! And I do feel like I didn't actually get sleep at all. Maybe this happened to me!" Once someone thinks it's possible, it's easy to convince themselves it did happen.
For those who don't agree with me, show me a photo of a triangular incision, or a metal implact, or ANYTHING that is often cited in abduction reports. Surely not every doctor in the world is part of the conspiracy, and at least one person has their metal implant at home?
The incident appears to involve independent confirma-tion of a CE3 and missing time in that at least two and possibly three groups of people unknown to each other witnessed the same UFO and entities, and experienced missing time. Perhaps for the first time, independent wit-nesses have offered strikingly similar information, thus making a convincing case for the reality of the strange events described.
This reality is further strengthened by a range of apparently related physical traces, including ground traces, a low level magnetic anomaly apparently consistent with the location of the UFO encounter, and effects on some of the witnesses.
...
www.theozfiles.com...
www.theozfiles.com...
Originally posted by nullster
The point I am making is that abductees and their stories lack real imagination.
If abductees were more science and technology observant their stories wouldn't sound so 1960-70'ish. If Aliens were so advanced they would be able to draw everything they needed without physicaly needing to abduct a human. Of course, then it wouldn't be any fun and wouldn't be news worthy. That's why these abduction stories will persist even after mankind surpasses Alien medical methodology.
First, setting aside whatever "facts" you think the author is ignoring, the UFO community does need to address why there is such a variety of reports and evident motives, if the stories are true. Why such inconsistency?
Second, despite over 50 years of modern UFO incidents (and perhaps hundreds of years before that), there is still no good, hard evidence of the phenomena out before the public. Why not? And please don't say its all been hidden by the authorities. Maybe, but I can't evaluate it.
Third, there is no question that the field has become rife with phonies, charlatans and madmen over the years. Combine that with the lack of hard proof, and you should not be surprised at the prevailing skepticism.