It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WaxPineapple
Basically what i mean is that people who go around in threads saying u.f.o.'s are real, when they are reffering to aliens, shouldn't refer to the term u.f.o.'s. A U.F.O is an unidentified flying object, it cannot be an alien space craft unless you have already identified it which most people, if not all of us can do, because we do not know if aliens truely do exist or not.
Originally posted by Manincloak
.
Any UFO should be considered to be an extra-terrestrial craft unless proven otherwise.
Originally posted by Spreadthetruth
I really get annoyed when people say UFOs don't exist.... Because they do. It doesn't mean they are alien craft...... Thats just one possibility.....
The truth is that there are unknown objects flying around us, in space and on our planet...... Its 100% fact UFOs exist.
Originally posted by shorty
We are fully aware of what the term UFO means, I can assure you of that. Because we theorize and speculate that UFOs could be of ET origin doesn't mean we all automatically assume that they are or that we confuse ET craft with UFOs.
The reason that UFO has become a widely accepted term in the UFOlogy community is simply that, while some guess their origin to be ET, to all intense and purposes, they are still unidentified flying objects.
Originally posted by benevolent tyrant
I beg to differ. Any "unidentified flying object" should be considered an object that is a traditional aircraft and/or astronomic anomaly before it can be considered to be an alien spacecraft.
Originally posted by benevolent tyrant
Most ufos' are, upon examination, found to be aircraft, weather balloons, satellites, Venus or stars
Originally posted by benevolent tyrantor some phenomenon created by atmospheric conditions.