It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Zanzibar
Those laws are bullcrap, just give the robot a gun and program it to hunt and destroy heat signatures or something.
That one with the trumpet looks paticulary menacing as well, he might play off-key at me!
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
Asimov's laws are a work of fiction created for his fictional positronic brain robots.If we base Future A.I on laws created by a Sci-fi writer we are in big trouble. The 3 laws are too simplistic to ensure a positive outcome when we get true A.I. You cant assume that a robot would interpret the laws the same way a human being would.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
Originally posted by Zanzibar
Those laws are bullcrap, just give the robot a gun and program it to hunt and destroy heat signatures or something.
That one with the trumpet looks paticulary menacing as well, he might play off-key at me!
umm.. I was talking about sentient robots who had a sense of judgement..
Those laws aren't "bullcrap"..
Originally posted by phixion
Yeah didn't the law's in iRobet turn out to be flawed anyway? I thought that was the whole point to the film, the robots re-programmed themselves?
Originally posted by sardion2000
The scariest thing about humans and AI is how we will probably treat them when they start asking for basic rights Watch the Animatrix for a picture of that scenario.
Originally posted by sardion2000
In the next 20 years Nano-Biotechnology is going to give us the technology to augment our own "Brainpower" and other attributes you would want to improve upon through various implants and genetic treatments.
I personally believe we will rely on AI just as much as they will rely on us
[edit on 12-10-2005 by sardion2000]