Originally posted by Balthasar
Thanks for the brief bio on Skull and Bones. I think I already addressed the fact that everyone is related one way or another. HOWEVER, the difference
is that they are direct descendents of European royalty.
Kerry is not a direct descendant of any european royals because his paternal line is jewish emigres. A direct line can only mean a paternal line of
George Bush Sr. is
No he isn't
as well as a large number of our founding fathers.
Thats because in the 1700s, masonry was wildly popular.
If you had actually taken the time to scroll down the Skull and Bones list you would have noticed that nobody is marked with a J for
should look at the list, it has in the legend "j' for jew and notes that its incomplete and marks people as being jewish, such
Albert Hessberg II S&B 1938 J
Thomas Henry Guinzberg S&B 1950 J
It also makes other marks but give no explanation, such as RS and W and E and MC. Maybe an E MC is an Evil rapper or somesuch.
If you want to be nit-picky at least be accurate and try not to make irrelevant comments that don’t pertain to the discussion.
its certainly relevant if your information is comming from anti-semitic lunatics. If they think that merely beign a jew is enough to put one 'in'
on a conspiracy, well thats idiotic and their other assements are also blackened by that. There's obivously a logical disconnect with the person.
I think the list was leaked to Icke if you want some Conspiratorial credibility.
You 'think' it was leaked to icke?
The page lists its source. That source is an anonymous email to a email listserv.
Whatever. For your convenience, here are the links to the family trees.
This is absurd. Its an excellent example of how everyone is related to everyone else, these are not direct lines of descent. Also, notice the very
large gaps here:
And the idea that anyone can trace the ancestry of Powell in any detail is just ridiculous, powell's black, his line was brought into north america
via slavery, there are no records of what slaves breed with what other slaves nor which of the slave owner bred with what slaves.
All of the lines in the Bush-Churchill-Roosevelt chart involve lots of female lines of descent, this is entirely meaningless, they aren't even
showing what lines of marriage are invovled. ANYONE
can be traced back to royalty in this way, equally directly. And don't you notice that
the Bush-Kerry tree is comletely different from the Bush-Churchill-Roosevelt Tree? Thats because everyone is related to everyone else, and you can
draw multiple lines of descent between lots of different people. Every generation that you go back you double the number of ancestors, you are one,
your parents are two, your grandparents are 4, 8, 16, 100, etc etc, there are lots of individuals to jump around a tree and draw scattered lines of
one of the Nazi dealing companies that Prescott Sheldon Bush owned d
From what I recall, he didn't own the company, he had a stake in it, he wasn't the sole owner nor the director of it.
all the way back to King David.
Thats because all these kings make up pedigrees to show that they are divinely royal and blessed by god.