posted on Oct, 3 2005 @ 03:25 PM
344. Roberts, a secret agent of D.O.J. (9/18/05)
Roberts ducked important questions Demo asked him in hearing. So at the end he is mostly a man of unknown to the people. This is a typical figure of
D.O.J.: hide everything with a cover. Does everything in covert.
Is he a speculator? After he refuses to show his stand, he can later turn out to be red, or if necessary, to be blue. Or just a flip-flop. This is a
typical figure of secret agent. They really have no interest in any side. They only favor what their master favors. So they have no opinion of their
He will be selected as the judge of Supreme Court. Because that's the choice of Inside Group. Bush is only a puppet to deliver the words. Demo
Senators only played a little bit what opposition Party should do. They knew Roberts will take over the seat. All this is a drama.
But when you select a general, how can you know nothing of his opinion about war? (his excuse is he only can answer in specific battle) How can you
select a CEO for the company who refuse to express his idea about economy?
When US politics develops to this point that an mostly unknown person can take such an important job, is this drama too ridiculous? Bush
administration even sealed Roberts record from public.
Roberts is more likely a secret agent who will work for the Feds, (D.O.J.) and the real master behind - Israel.
D.O.J. hurriedly sent Roberts to the seat of Chief Justice is for the framed case of September 24, I think. My case is the most important one for
D.O.J. since I reveal the true face (crime) of them. To frame a case, they even sacrifice both directors of FBI and DEA in a secret deal in 2001.
On 5/10/2002, I wrote "65. Birthday Party on May 3 (5/10)", revealed there was an attempt framed case on me and my family on 5/3. Several days
later, my tenant and a neighborhood suddenly left.(both were from China. see #85, 86) It was until three months later when newspaper reported Ashcroft
had been rebuked by judge in May for cheating the court, I then knew I was under the surveillance by FISA warrant. When judge found they were cheated
by Ashcroft and FBI, they cancelled the warrant. Two Chinese secret police, my tenant and a neighborhood, had to leave.
The surveillance recovered in November 2002 when D.O.J. claimed Patriot Act gave them such power. But how could they frame an innocent man without
evidence? They still need evidence to carry out an arrest.
Since then, D.O.J. tried their best to "break" the wall of "share information from foreign intelligence" with "domestic criminal law
enforcement". The recent "Pentagon's information about Atta" is such an effort.
This issue must have been passed into Supreme Court. I think, Chief Justice William Rehnquist had defended the fourth Amendment of the Constitution.
Thus he became the obstacle of D.O.J.. He had a cancer.
If Rehnquist's health condition was very bad, he would have resigned earlier. But he hadn't. That means he himself felt he was still OK for the job.
His death was sudden. I think it was a controlled murder. I have said, "2. Control the death on will. They can make target getting sick by slow
poison, once the death is necessary for Feds, what they have to do is just increase the dose, the target died to intelligence' demand without causing
a suspicion." (186. Slow poison (12/6/03))
When I found there was another big framed case set up on 9/24, I revealed it on 9/2. (see "339. The September plot (9/2/05)") Next day, Chief
Rehnquist died. Roberts is hurried to be nominated and said his confirmation is almost certain and will be in post in October. Because the framed case
will break off on 9/24. D.O.J. needs a man of their own to guarantee the case can be set up by "sharing foreign intelligence information with
domestic criminal law enforcement"
William Rehnquist's death and Roberts' nomination may signal the death of 4th Amendment that American people will lose the protection from
"unreasonable search and arrest". US Justice will be ruled by an evil group.
(The 4th Amendment has been made to protect people from the "plant" of corruptive law enforcement force. That the warrant must based on evidence not
the "plant". The "sharing information" low the standard to "suspicion" (foreign intelligence source) and made search and arrest possible based
on "plant". see "335. 4th Amendment (8/17/05)")