The MOON created by Aliens????...................Was it built for us?????

page: 3
2
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join

posted on Aug, 5 2006 @ 02:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by Byrd
HOWEVER, it's too big for an asteroid. Asteroids are little and lumpy (like coal or rocks in a river bed.)


What.. So Ceres isn't an asteroid?




posted on Aug, 5 2006 @ 04:27 PM
link   
Aliens ? NO .. . . The matter found on moon can be found on earth..nothing alien about moon. ... The Sun and it's solar storms are alienesque arent they. Energy not from this planet. Cosmic showers? Meteorites with water inside the clay. How do you think water got here ? from Meteor bombardment. Water is alien force...a very powerful alien force.



posted on Aug, 5 2006 @ 04:34 PM
link   

It has also been suggested that the moon is hollow like the "death star"

Gentlemen, I purpose a daring venture to the CORE of this "moon", we'll be en route with a squadron of X-Wings.
The purpose you may ask? Annihilate the Imperial presence in our galaxy. If left to their own devices, I fear impending doom.



posted on Mar, 26 2007 @ 11:53 PM
link   
The moon is in Gravity lock and does not spin like th earth. I also think that the moon is the ISS for Adromedans and Sirians. They use the moon to monitor us and change our weather to meet corporate needs.



posted on Mar, 27 2007 @ 03:57 AM
link   
Sweet Anita, you've got it exactly backwards.

The Moon wasn't made for us. We evolved to adapt to the Moon.

The natural environment shaped us to be what we are through a process called evolution, which you may have heard of. Animals (and people) adapt to their environment through evolution. The moon was -- and is -- part of our environment. We have adapted to it so well you think it was created for us. This just goes to show what a powerful force natural selection is -- it fooled you into thinking aliens built the Moon!

Your argument is like that of foolish people who think God created the world for human beings, just because it contains air we can breathe, plants and animals we can eat and use for other purposes, a Sun to give heat and light, a Moon to light the night sky and mark the passage of time, and so on.

In fact, it's exactly the opposite. We (like all other life-forms on this planet) evolved to take advantage of what was already there -- the Sun, the Moon, the air, the seasons, the plants, the animals and so on. And as the environment slowly changed (in part because of our influence on it) we, too, changed to adapt to it.

There now, that wasn't so hard to understand, was it?

[edit on 27-3-2007 by Astyanax]



posted on Mar, 27 2007 @ 05:29 PM
link   
Astanax, do you dispute my claim?

Please realize that the moon is an artificial satellite just like the ones we build except that the moon is elementally created by divine nature. But it is still artificial.



posted on Mar, 29 2007 @ 12:55 AM
link   
Think of the moon as the equators North Pole.



posted on Mar, 29 2007 @ 04:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by StreetCorner Philosopher
Astanax, do you dispute my claim?

And which claim might that be, O Wise But Homeless One? The one about 'friction' causing salt crystals to clump together, or that the moon is a space station built by the Sirians and the Andromedans (you may want to consult a suitable source of information regarding the relative distances of these two celestial objects from Earth) or that (somewhat in contradiction to the preceding), the moon is an artifact of 'divine nature', whatever that is?

Tell me, and I'll tell you.



posted on Mar, 30 2007 @ 07:38 PM
link   
The Human Genome project is taking place on the moon. HAARP started out on the moon. Psychotronic purposes are what this satellite is used for. Do you have a telescope? do you know about the Helium 3 development project taking place on the moon right now? I don't think we have evidence of this, but I can tell you that some indirect evidence does add up. I suggest you read the book "Who built the moon" by Christopher Knight.

But the #1 reason I think the Moon is controlled is because of the state of gravity lock that it's in. All moons observed so far rotate. Why doesn't ours?



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 03:00 PM
link   
I doubt it was created, if so then why the hell are there aliens on the moon mining something? Makes no sense.


Perhaps the aliens arent mining something, but rather, controlling something. Theres no proof saying there are(nt) aliens. If there was, we would have no clue as to what theyre doing on/in it. For all we know, they could be controlling the earth, triggering such events as earthquakes, hurricanes, and other not so natural events.

I dont necessarily believe what I say, just throwing something out there...



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 04:09 PM
link   
reply to post by xlc sil3nce
 


Now that's funny!
If you say it, and don't believe it yourself, why on Earth, or the moon for that matter, should we believe it?

I do love this place, in all it's wacky splendor.



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 07:17 PM
link   
reply to post by NGC2736
 


Just to make a point that anyone can make a theory. No matter how absurd it is someone may believe it, teach it, and could eventually be some commonly taught idea. Pretty much everything involving space is a theory ( for the history aspect). There is no way to determine what will happen. I just felt like making a point



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 07:34 PM
link   
reply to post by xlc sil3nce
 


I can see that, now.
And I wasn't giving you a bad time over it at all, it just struck me funny. (I wonder how many ideas do start out that way?)

I'm sure that we'll all be throwing out "theories" till the cows come home; or at least till we get a lot more solid proof than we have now.



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 12:39 AM
link   
I think this is more of an argument for the existence of God than alien design. It seems to support intelligent design in that the moon has been finely tuned to help support life on earth.



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 01:21 AM
link   
I always wondered if Venus and the Earth were very similiar with very dense atmospheres with a very hot surface where there was no liquid water at all. Venus is still in this condition. I heard that the Earth once was very hot with no liquid on the surface. I wondered what if a Mars size object collided with the Earth and blasted away much of our atmosphere and the two planets reformed with the smaller one becoming known as our moon.

Every time I heard the Earth was once too hot to support any water on the surface, I wondered how did it cool off? I believe proving theories that the Earth and Venus were that similiar might be difficult to prove especially the one I just mentioned where a large object blasted away most of the thick atmosphere. I believe that part is my theory. If we knew more about planets in other star systems, we would know if planets were more likely to be like Venus or more like the Earth. If the Earth had a lucky accident, finding more Earth like planets may be more difficult than astronomers imagined.

Responding to an earlier post, the moon does rotate, it just does it in synch with the Earth so that the same side faces the Earth. The "dark" side of the moon is just the side that is not visible to us. There is a day and night there. The moon is moving away from the Earth. It's a very slow process so I don't believe we have any danger of something like the old sci-fi tv show Space 1999.



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 11:38 AM
link   
I think an alien on another world would look around and observe how amazingly life has adpated and is suited to their own planet, one with its own idiosyncrasies diffirent from earth

that alien might come to the conclusion life is only possible on planets exactly like theirs. But he would be wrong


[edit on 26-11-2007 by yeti101]



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 12:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by StreetCorner Philosopher
But the #1 reason I think the Moon is controlled is because of the state of gravity lock that it's in. All moons observed so far rotate. Why doesn't ours?


Completely false. Most moons in the solar system are actually tidally locked to their parent bodies, the same way our moon is to Earth.



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 01:02 PM
link   
Originally posted by cdrn




Completely false. Most moons in the solar system are actually tidally locked to their parent bodies, the same way our moon is to Earth.



Thanks for the post cdrn. Your post is completely false. "Tidal locking" is a recent scientific fantasy dreamed up to account for the rotational lock of the moon. "Tidal Locking" is an 'excuse' that was fabricated to account for an effect of rotational lock as "Gravitons" were dreamed up to account for gravity. Neither fabrication has any basis in reality.

The moons rotational lock is due to the way it was placed there in orbit around the Earth by those who placed it there, not by 'tidal locking'.

The moon was placed it in rotational lock specifically to 'hide' the farside from human view. The farside of the moon has rivers, lakes, vegetation, cities, machinery, artifacts, constructs, and other amazing things that are not meant to be seen by humans. Many of these objects can be seen in the John Lear Photos of the Moon or on thelivingmoon.com.

There is a civilization on the moon of humans just like us here on Earth. They are considerably more advanced. There is also an alien presence on the moon. There are also huge underground laboratories and factories.

The moon has a breathable atmosphere that is denser on the farside than on the side that we can see from Earth. This is a fact that is carefully hidden from the public.

The U.S. has been on the moon since 1962 and set up mining operations shortly after that. Many of these details are in Project Horizon, a copy of which is available from the Army in Huntsville, Alabama.

Projects Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, Spacelab were all 'cover' for what the U.S. has really been doing on the moon.

Other than NAZA and ESA do you have any evidence that "most moons in the solar system are actually tidally locked to their parent bodies"?

But thanks for your post it is genuinely appreciated and presents a generally believed, if not archaic mainstream scientific view. Not to be confused with the truth.



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 05:42 PM
link   
John Lear, how do you get away with being so pompous? It's kinda funny, actually, if you think about it.

Anyways,

1. Gravity gradients cause torques on non-spherical bodies! This is simply a consequence of Newtonian dynamics and is very, very easy to prove mathematically.

2. Does this mean that Io, Ganymede, Europa, Callisto, Titan, Triton, Phobos, Deimos, etc. were also artificially placed in their orbits? Are their rotations synchronous in order to not let all the "people" on Mars, Saturn, Jupiter, Neptune and Pluto see all the goodies on the far sides?

edit #2: I've been spending way too much time on this site for no good reason. If a mod sees this, could you please ban my IP? I appreciate it.

[edit on 26-11-2007 by cdrn]

[edit on 26-11-2007 by cdrn]



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 05:48 PM
link   
reply to post by johnlear
 


John, I realize that this is an older thread, with a lot of speculation in it, but without something besides your saying it's true, we're at a point where nothing is accomplished without proof. And by proof, I don't mean quoting yourself from another forum, or using some shadow operatives words from a point in the past, or using some controversial book by a huckster out for a dime.

Do you now have anything that can either scientifically or physically back up these claims? And by those terms, I mean science as it is understood by the vast majority of educated humans, or that can be physically analyzed or shown through a generally accepted medium.

While you might remember something a certain way, there are those that could say you could have had a mind manipulation event by the NWO government, and that makes your honest memory unreliable. The same could be applied to any of us, so we must also show some form of proof. This is the way learning takes place for most of us.

Thank You





top topics
 
2
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join