It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why and how the england invaded The Malvinas Island

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 27 2005 @ 04:52 PM
link   
Argentina inherited of Spain its rights mainly the territory patrio, of which also the Malvinas Islands comprised, the 25 of May of 1810. In 1825, Argentina signed a treaty of Peace and Friendship with England. Nevertheless, the 3 of January of 1833, the English invaded the islands and took prisoners to the Argentine authorities, initiating the occupation that lasted 149 years uninterrupted, during which Argentina tried by all the possible diplomatic routes the return of the usurped territory, until the 2 of April of 1982.




posted on Sep, 27 2005 @ 05:01 PM
link   
TROLL!

ask the Falklanders who they wish to rule them.... UK mate.. dont feel too bad... Galteri was only trying to humour you guys by screwing with us after all

btw,

COME AND HAVE A GO IF YOU THINK YOU'RE HARD ENOUGH!

[edit on 27-9-2005 by Daystar]



posted on Sep, 27 2005 @ 05:03 PM
link   
Tough. There English islands, the people there want to be English, during the Falklands war they flouted all the 'Argentinian' rules force on them, for instance being made to drive on the right.

Argentina has as much right to the Falklands as they do Brazil, or Gibraltar. Non whatsoever in other words.

When the nation went down the tubes it was decided that a quick war would takes peoples minds off it. The war was lost.

Get over it. Brittania ruled the waves one last time and kicked the Argentinian military in the arse. To recover British land, a superb moment in our history.



posted on Sep, 27 2005 @ 05:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by Daystar
TROLL!

ask the Falklanders who they wish to rule them.... UK mate.. dont feel too bad... Galteri was only trying to humour you guys by screwing with us after all

btw,

COME AND HAVE A GO IF YOU THINK YOU'RE HARD ENOUGH!

[edit on 27-9-2005 by Daystar]


The inhabitants of Malvinas are rebelious Argentinian. They is thinking that always will be colony hahhah . The true is close so close.



posted on Sep, 27 2005 @ 05:06 PM
link   
If they are rebellious Argentinians why do you even want them back? Surely its easier to make it someone elses problem.



posted on Sep, 27 2005 @ 05:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by Arkantos

The inhabitants of Malvinas are rebelious Argentinian. They is thinking that always will be colony hahhah . The true is close so close.


If you insist, but i would have to say they would prolly migrate to england before ever submitting to the Argentinian government...

But you are a troll so you wont be worth arguing with.... when however you have actually spoken with a kelper, then you will see they are UK forever

and as i said you boys can try again... we'll just hit back harder this time

[edit on 27-9-2005 by Daystar]



posted on Sep, 27 2005 @ 05:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by Uncle Joe
If they are rebellious Argentinians why do you even want them back? Surely its easier to make it someone elses problem.

We don´t wanna that they return, we wanna that they go home.



posted on Sep, 27 2005 @ 05:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by Daystar

Originally posted by Arkantos

The inhabitants of Malvinas are rebelious Argentinian. They is thinking that always will be colony hahhah . The true is close so close.


If you insist, but i would have to say they would prolly migrate to england before ever submitting to the Argentinian government...

But you are a troll so you wont be worth arguing with.... when however you have actually spoken with a kelper, then you will see they are UK forever

and as i said you boys can try again... we'll just hit back harder this time

[edit on 27-9-2005 by Daystar]


I´m sorry the kelpers doesn´t exist, the kelper not have right about the malvinas.



posted on Sep, 27 2005 @ 05:11 PM
link   
They dont want to, so why should they?



posted on Sep, 27 2005 @ 05:12 PM
link   
The Falkland Islands are and will always be British territory.

Case closed.

Why are we discussing this?



posted on Sep, 27 2005 @ 05:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by Arkantos
I´m sorry the kelpers doesn´t exist, the kelper not have right about the malvinas.


OHHHHHHHH

but i thought they were rebellious argies?

'silence'

i do so love it when the trolls screw themselves lol.....



posted on Sep, 27 2005 @ 05:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by djohnsto77
The Falkland Islands are and will always be British territory.

Case closed.

Why are we discussing this?

Explain , please like you have a territory behind of Argentian hahahh.



posted on Sep, 27 2005 @ 05:21 PM
link   
en.wikipedia.org...


The Falkland Islands are an archipelago in the South Atlantic continental shelf consisting of two main islands, East Falkland and West Falkland, and a number of smaller islands. They are a largely self-governing overseas territory of the United Kingdom. Port Stanley, also known as Stanley, is the capital and largest city, on East Falkland. In Argentina, the islands are known by their Spanish name, Islas Malvinas and their capital by the name Puerto Argentino..

The sovereignty of the Falkland Islands has been disputed since their discovery, with France, Spain, Argentina and the United Kingdom all claiming possession after establishing settlements on the islands. Argentina is the only country to still maintain a claim over the islands, and other territories in the South Atlantic currently under British dominion. The sovereignty dispute was the source of the 1982 Falklands War when the islands were invaded by Argentina, only to be retaken by the British after a short land war. The sovereignty of the islands remains disputed, but the islanders themselves wish to remain British.


get over it, the Brits won and kicked Argentina's butt back to where they came from which is next door of course. but still the Brits won it fair and square.



posted on Sep, 27 2005 @ 05:44 PM
link   
With Argentina's record on human rights during the 1970's and early 80's, allowing the FALKLANDS (you get to name territory you defend) to fall back into Argentine hands would have been a true war crime. Argentina was a nasty unpleasant little military dictatorship.

Judging by the way that the Argentine soldiers behaved on the Islands during the occupation, it's not somewhere you would have put on your holiday short-list.

Once again (moderators permitting):

1. The Argies rigged a rocket launcher on a school play slide.
2. They looted houses
3. They used homeowners bathtubs as convenient latrines.
4. They moved their artillery pieces into the gaps between occupied houses.

If this is classed as "slamming" another nation, tough, I still have the unforgiveable habit of slamming the Germans for killing 6 million jews.

Some acts should never be forgotten, or forgiven.

This is from today's news though, sort of ironic:

www.cnn.com...

[edit on 27-9-2005 by Winchester Ranger T]



posted on Oct, 16 2005 @ 04:18 PM
link   
That Britain didn't suceed invading Argentina in the 19th century.
We would be like an American Australia .
I am ashamed to be an Argie
This has not been a Republic for decades, just a sad,bloody and expensive joke of a country since Peron took power

It is becoming a huge coc aine producing country, USA is aware of it, no wonder they are setting military bases in Paraguay

Venezuela,Bolivia an Argentina , the South American Axis of Evil

[edit on 16-10-2005 by Vladtepes]



posted on Nov, 8 2005 @ 12:42 PM
link   
I didint know ENGLAND invaded the falklands...hmm mabye I missed the creation of the english army, navy and airforce..Must have also mised the invasion and ovethrowing of the BRITISH forces there..
BTW, daystar I agree...I smell a troll..




top topics



 
0

log in

join