Abydos Temple Hieroglyphics, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 14-10-2005 @ 03:33 PM by torbjon
The image posted by Nygdan is a relief from the palace of Ashur-nasir-pal II at Nimrud (northwest palace)

www.edwardtbabinski.us...

The reason the picture is “out of context” is that the site has been looted, ‘excavated’ and bombed (91-92 Gulf War) and there is not much of the site left.

www.learningsites.com...

www.learningsites.com...

(the learningsite has a virtual tour of the palace, but you need some special software to see it, which I have not tried to download…)

I believe that that particular panel is on exhibit in the Slater Cast Collection of the British Museum:

www.norwichfreeacademy.com...

Other ‘out of context’ panels from the British Museum:

www.msm.cam.ac.uk...

Other panels can be found in other museums:

(University of Dublin)
www.tcd.ie...

(The Metropolitan Museum of Art)
www.metmuseum.org...{38EEFC02-0906-4F2A-BB68-116D6EC25E9D}

(Los Angeles City Museum of Art)
www.lacma.org...

Other panel can be found in other museums, universities, and private collections.

So the problem with these pictures is not that they are simply focused on the central artwork, the problem with these pictures is that is All that there is to work with. The rest of the artwork has been hacked up by ‘archeologists’, treasure hunters, fame seekers, tomb robbers, and warmongers, and the surviving panels have been distributed around the world.

Has anyone noticed the lines of cuneiform carved over this panel? Looking at other panels from this palace you can see more lines of cuneiform carved over them as well. Somebody came along after the original relief was created and carved some text on top of it, further evidence to support Byrds palimpsest theory for the Abydos carvings. The ancients were carve happy. They carved on and over Everything…

Except the Great Pyramid… odd that.


reply posted on 14-10-2005 @ 04:41 PM by Byrd
Originally posted by torbjon
The image posted by Nygdan is a relief from the palace of Ashur-nasir-pal II at Nimrud (northwest palace)


Thanks for the research! It's nice to see it in its context.


I believe that that particular panel is on exhibit in the Slater Cast Collection of the British Museum:
www.norwichfreeacademy.com...



Other ‘out of context’ panels from the British Museum:
www.msm.cam.ac.uk...

Actually, those aren't out of context. We see a description of what they are, where they were found and how old they were (the context) and a summary of the text on the monument (which you can then go and read for yourself if you really really want to fry your brain with cuneiform.)

"Out of context" means it's shown with no explaination of what it was, where it came from, and what is associated with it. We do have out of context artifacts in museums, by the way...


(University of Dublin)
www.tcd.ie...

(The Metropolitan Museum of Art)
www.metmuseum.org...{38EEFC02-0906-4F2A-BB68-116D6EC25E9D}

(Los Angeles City Museum of Art)
www.lacma.org...


Great stuff! I particularly appreciate the notes on what's going on in the pictures here because I don't read cuneiform.

Has anyone noticed the lines of cuneiform carved over this panel? Looking at other panels from this palace you can see more lines of cuneiform carved over them as well. Somebody came along after the original relief was created and carved some text on top of it, further evidence to support Byrds palimpsest theory for the Abydos carvings. The ancients were carve happy. They carved on and over Everything…


Actually, that was done at the time of its construction and not afterwards. But you're quite right... that's how they did it then! I liked being able to see the artwork larger because you could then see it wasn't just pictures there -- there was writing that explained what was going on.

Except the Great Pyramid… odd that.


I'm sure there were other things that weren't carved on. And we don't have the outer skin of the pyramid (I believe it was limestone facing), where they could have carved all sorts of stuff. That would be interesting if, say, they had carved a huge relief of the Pharoah on the outside of the pyramid (no, there's no evidence that they did this.)



reply posted on 14-10-2005 @ 06:01 PM by torbjon
ya, by ‘out of context’ I did mean when folks just post a picture without saying where it came from or doing any additional research on it…

The museum pics/websites are still ‘out of context’ in a way, in that the panels are no longer in their original locations, there’s still missing or damaged sections of walls etc. etc. With all of the damage done to these sites over the years it’s amazing anybody can figure Anything out about the ancient past, ya know?

The outside of the Great Pyramid Was cased with white stone, the stones were carved and decorated, and then the stones were recycled and re-carved by subsequent generations and used as building blocks for a variety of new structures.

What gets me is all of that bare rock on the Inside of the thing just itching to have some paint splashed on it…

The recycling of the casing stones helps to illustrate my point of Where the stuff goes. Nothing went to waste with ancient (and more modern) peoples, not even rock. 5000 years ago that ‘thing’ might have been a functioning crystal radio set. 4000 years ago it was a non-functioning religious relic. 3000 years ago it was the spoils of war. 2000 years ago it was pounded into a bit of jewelry. 1000 years ago it was hacked into pieces and traded for a really good night on the town. Now little bits of it are on display in various museums around the world *shrugs*

The WTC is rapidly becoming the USS New York. I could be really wrong on this, but I feel that most folks would have a very hard time looking at a boat and then saying “oh ya, that used to be a building”…

(btw, thanks fer the applause Byrd and good ta see ya back Odium)


reply posted on 15-10-2005 @ 10:00 PM by torbjon
At the risk of sounding like a complete idiot, I’m not willing to rule out magnito_students theory of precognition.

I know that a lot of people shun the nutty crunchy stuff and say that all of the published studies are inconclusive. I won’t argue with them.

However my own studies have led me to believe that precognition is a very real thing, and perhaps that is what some ancients experienced. That is Not my theory as regards to ancient tech. As stated, I do indeed believe that there was some small amount of high tech in our deep dark past that helped to spark the myths, legends and religions that we are experiencing today.

As to my own experience with precognition, many years ago I could not accept the belief that the phenomena known as “DejaVu” was simply one eye seeing something before the other (the standard scientific explanation) and felt that there was something else going on.

Being immersed in science classes at the time, I wanted to take a scientific approach to the problem. Not knowing just exactly How to go about doing that, I decided that the only thing I could do would be to document Everything.

What I ended up doing was spending two years keeping two journals; a ‘dream journal’ where I recorded every dream or vision I had while sleeping, and a ‘normal journal’ where I recorded everything that happened during my waking life.

Long story short, at the end of two years I came to the conclusion that some of my dreams were indeed very accurate visions of my own personal future. The details were too specific and too esoteric to be coincidence or happenstance.

The percentage of ‘dreams come true’ was small, just over five percent… not enough to really do anything with or work with. Perhaps just enough to have some small bit of survival value, I don’t know *shrugs*

Again, I don’t believe that precognition is the source for all ancient myths and legends, but I do perceive it to be a valid hypothesis


reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 10:57 PM by Anonymous ATS
I have to wonder about this subject and both theories; however, I feel as if I must keep an open mind for the simple reason that we know that historically, the inhabitants of the lost city of Atlantis existed. It's citizens were among the most brilliant engineers of that time. History hints at the fact that perhaps survivors of whatever destroyed Atlantis scattered to the wind carrying their skills with them. This seems plausible given the fact that we have Egyptian pyramids that closely resemble Mayan temples, Inca temples, and various temples in various areas across Europe. Heck, the Romans managed to create baths with heated water, which ultimately means they had indoor plumbing. So one has to wonder why, if such an ancient civilization could bring water into a city and create indoor baths with heated water, why is it that the people living after the fall of Rome and before modern civilization did not have indoor plumbing of that magnitude?

The summer cabin at the beach where I stayed off an on throughout the summers of my childhood did not have indoor plumbing. It had a pitcher pump outside. The water was cold! It was downright icey throughout the year but especially in the winter months. If the Romans could create heated baths then why is it that civilization that followed Roman times appeared ignorant to the engineering to recreate heated baths for one's home?

There is so much advanced technology lost to history. I find it difficult to completely take in the thought that all is due to accident or misconception. There is too much proof available for the smaller stuff to completely rule out the larger stuff. I'm not saying that aliens did this, in fact, I am quite adamant that it was man but even so, how did this world lose that technology so quickly? Why did future civilizations NOT pick up where their ancestors left off? If they had, we should be much further along technologically than we are now or so I believe because it stands to reason that one great idea should open the door for more ideas that build upon the original making it better than the predecessor.

Just curious.

Paise


reply posted on 2-9-2009 @ 05:59 PM by serin sister
Originally posted by Byrd
You can see the overcarving all over the pampliset if you just know how to read hieroglyphics. I do (rather badly, I should add.)

Here's the semi-original (photoshopped) version:



Now, just look at what was done to the names:
Here's that darling son, Ramses, whose Praenomen is Setepenre Usermaatre


And here's dear old dad (Seti) - Menmaatre to his buddies -- the one whose temple his darling little boy was appropriating for his own glory:


And because my tracing is SO bad, here's what the two cartouches really look like (both nomen and praenomen):


Seti's full name (nomen and praenomen) is Menmaatre Sety-meryenptah and Ramses has a big mouthfull of a nomen and praenomen with Usermaatre-setepenre Ramesse-meryamun

Ramses the Modest's name can be loosely translated as "Powerful in Truth, Chosen of Ra" (and that was his first name) "Ramses - Beloved of Amun" (second name)

Anyway, that's why to Egyptology buffs like myself (and to archaeologists and so forth) that we know it's an overinscribed panel and that part of the old is showing through. And how we know what the rest of the title says.

I hope it's okay if I don't tie up our bandwidth with the rest of the exercise, which was done at that link above. But if you look at the original and look at the many other times this title was repeated (we have other examples), you can very clearly see the overcarving.

Oh yes, and the bee and plant next to the cartouches mean "king of upper and lower Egypt."


[edit on 26-9-2005 by Byrd]

[edit on 26-9-2005 by Byrd]


these quote to meen seem as though they need to be sung, like mantras why am i thinking the sound or frequency created from this is very very powerful
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Origin of Ancient Jade Tool Baffles Scientists
  Posted 6 days ago with 96 member flags
12,000 Years Old Unexplained Structure
  Posted 3 days ago with 80 member flags
The Uluburun shipwreck sunk 3,400 years ago
  Posted 14 days ago with 70 member flags
Sigiriya : The 8th Wonder of the World
  Posted 3 days ago with 45 member flags
Tomb of Queen Heterpheres
  Posted 15 days ago with 29 member flags
R.O.V. Photos of Sunken Megaliths off Western Cuba
  Posted 10 days ago with 21 member flags