JKersteJr
I think that a lot of the mainstream media you see on TV is totally government influenced propaganda and deception, however, maybe a percentage of
these news organizations aren't actually deliberately lying...perhaps some are just to ignorant to realize whats going on and they are just "doing
their job" or doing what the higher ups order them to do?
It's all about money JKJ, and profit. Like other industries, the media cuts costs to up profits. Now, there's no money for research and analysis -
so the "news" has become a venue for corporations and other special interests to distribute their press releases.
...The news media does NOT report news - it's just a press release distribution system.
This is what makes ATS and ATSNN so special IMO - we are picking up the slack, and doing what the news media used to do. We are thinking, analyzing,
researching - and going beyond the press releases.
...total military control in todays society would be a nightmare, and in the past few years my observations have forced me to seriously consider that
this may happen...and may happen soon. However realistic this scenario may seem to me, its difficult to imagine how the Government would take complete
control unless nukes start falling and/or we suffer many more "natural" disasters.
Which we will. Maybe earthquakes, definitely crazy destructive weather, epidemics.
JKersteJr
But just sit back and look at how dependant we are on the system and imagine that you may, in the aftermath of some terrible event, have no choice but
to let them protect you....or die.
Long Lance
if people cooperate voluntarily, why enact martial law? what do you need dictatorial powers for? because that's exactly what martial law means. those
who want to stay do so at their own peril, let them sign a declaration saying they rejected gov't assistance and move on, it's their life, they
should decide how to save it, shouldn't they?
I agree with Long Lance - government assistance does NOT require martial law, or fascist control. I also agree with JKJ - people will be given an
artificially polarised choice: "Let them protect you,
and control you, ....or die."
It may still be possible to demand value for our money - our tax contributions - and to function as the democracy we are supposed to be. None of the
coming catastrophes are a surprise - governments have known about them for decades; business has been positioning to profit from them for decades. Our
tax dollars should be used to protect the nation, and the nation's people - not funneled into the buddy system.
Maybe if we write letters, make phone calls, vote - then we can make a difference, and put our own money to good use.