It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by plop
Resistance, i dont see anything in ur bible arguments that states there is no life elsewhere in the universe.
Those words aren't used "There is no life elsewhere in the universe." But we can figure that out from what it DOES say.
1. The earth was the first thing God created.
2. The sun, moon and stars were created on the fourth day. The reasons Scripture gives for their creation have nothing to do with putting life on them.
So if the earth was just one heavenly body among trillions upon trillions, no better, no worse, just here waiting for the lightning to strike the soup and make some DNA or whatever we hear is how it all happened -- well, the Bible doesn't say this at all. As we well know.
Those words aren't used "There is no life elsewhere in the universe." But we can figure that out from what it DOES say.
1. The earth was the first thing God created.
2. The sun, moon and stars were created on the fourth day. The reasons Scripture gives for their creation have nothing to do with putting life on them.
So if the earth was just one heavenly body among trillions upon trillions, no better, no worse, just here waiting for the lightning to strike the soup and make some DNA or whatever we hear is how it all happened -- well, the Bible doesn't say this at all. As we well know.
He could have. But obviously he didn't. In order to have life you need oxygen and water. None of the planets have these.
Originally posted by TrentReznor
atheism.about.com...
I saw a fascinating interview with Sir David Attenborough a few months ago, in which he said that whenever he encounters this view, he cites the example of this African parasitic worm that burrows into the human eyeball, and is responsible for hundreds of thousands of children going blind every year. This worm doesn't live in any other environment, except the human eyeball. He said he just cannot believe that a benevolent god would create a creature for the sole purpose of making children blind.
Originally posted by resistance
Excuse me. They are uninhabitable. According to the Bible, they are just lights in the sky.
The the moon is the "lesser light" by night and the Sun the "greater light." The stars are for "times and seasons" and "to give light upon the earth."
Except possibly for Mars, even if we were able to get to these other planets we could not land on them. Their temperature, atmosphere, gravity, you name it -- would devour anything we tried to set down on these planetary bodies.
Plop says: If god exists, he could have created life on billions of planets as easily as he did on earth.
He could have. But obviously he didn't. In order to have life you need oxygen and water. None of the planets have these.
Originally posted by plop
I think its fine if u say that the bible indicates ET doesnt exist, but i would just like to see where it says so. If it does state so somewhere, then i dont have any problem with that.
There are many Christians (and also muslims and people of all other religions) that think its possible that ET life exists (including the vatican i believe). They also are true to the bible.
It seems to me u base it on the fact that the bible omits to mention ET life.
But the bible omits many things. It omits supernova, dinosaurs, nonlocality, etc. It simply isnt a book that contains all information of the entire universe.
Originally posted by resistance
God said he made the earth first, the sun, moon and stars on the fourth day. The stars were like an afterthought. i.e. ,"and he made the stars also. Gen. 1:16)
By using your brain and reading what God says about Creation and putting two and two together, we can figure out answers without having them specifically told, like a list of Q&As.
What do you mean by "true to the Bible?" They obviously don't believe the account God gave of how he created everything. We all know the Vatican believes in evolution, but who ever thought they were Christian in the first place?
I wouldn't say the Bible omits ET life at all. You can read the Bible and see what importance God puts on the stars. According to God, the stars are less important than our sun and moon, which He created BEFORE he made the stars. God considers the stars less important than Earth's grass, trees, and plants "after their kind." God considers an apple growing on earth to be more important than the stars. Otherwise, God would have created the stars FIRST, THEN the planets, THEN separated the water from the dry land and created all the plants "after their kind." And what purpose did God say he created the stars FOR? "to give light upon the earth, to divide the day from the night, for signs, seans and days and years." (Gen. 1:14)
Originally posted by TrentReznor
Back on topic,
I vote A + C
why,, I have seen in the last 3 months 2 Clearly intellegently controled objects, far out of the reach of human capabilaties, these were nuts n bolt things. so with all respect my mind is made up and I have no doubts whatsoeverand Nobody can take that away from me, its the best feeling in the world.
I got no proof whatsoever aswell, (damn camcorder batteries)
p.s. you can't have C without A
(resistance, no, these were not flying angels.)
[edit on 1-10-2005 by TrentReznor]
Originally posted by resistance
Plop, I misspoke myself above. I didn't mean to say there is no oxygen or water on any planet in the universe.I don't know that to be the case. There may be.