It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by devilwasp
Originally posted by American Mad Man
The tail and body of that aircraft look an awfull lot like that of the YF-23
Cough rip off cough...
Originally posted by ShatteredSkies
Now, why would they redesign the Su-47? It wouldn't make sense, [...] , it's pretty good, so I'd say that the Advantages out weigh the disadvantages on that one.
...Why would the Russian's waste so much money on an aircraft that in the end, they'd end up making conventional like this? The Russian's just don't have the money to be making choices like this, ...
Originally posted by Lonestar24
Originally posted by devilwasp
Originally posted by American Mad Man
The tail and body of that aircraft look an awfull lot like that of the YF-23
Cough rip off cough...
Oh please, no doubt about the usual chinese behaviour of copying and reverse-engineering, but this concept (if it indeed is a concept and not only some lonely artists design) does only have a very superficial similarity to the YF-23 above that they both are twin-engine stealth aircraft.
Originally posted by American Mad Man
Notice that both aircraft have the EXACT same body. Look at the engines and how they blend into the body of the aircraft. Notice the triangular area that protrudes between both engines. Look also at the shape of the tails. All EXACTLY the same.
If you can't see that, you need to see an eye doctor.
Originally posted by American Mad Man
Superficial my ass, it's the same damned aircraft - at least as far as the body. It's some CG artists rendering of a YF-23 with a different nose/cockpit, forward canards, and different wings.
Originally posted by sweatmonicaIdo
Well, if it works for them, I say China has every right to copy as they please. War doesn't care for who was more creative. Only who wins.
Originally posted by American Mad Man
In case someone is still wondering, the aircraft posted is just the work of someone playing around with the body of the YF/23.
That is all...
Originally posted by sweatmonicaIdo
Well, if it works for them, I say China has every right to copy as they please. War doesn't care for who was more creative. Only who wins.
Originally posted by Lonestar24
Adjusting concepts due to unbearable costs and technical unreliability ALWAYS makes sense. And that a technical demonstrator like the former Su-37 is being salvaged into a more conventional Su-47 (IF the production version will be "downgraded") is a perfectly understandable choice, nothing special to western developments either (RAH-66 anyone?).
And no offense meant, but this stereotypical phrase of the "Russians not having the money" to do something is contrary to the fact that Russian aviation has so far always managed to keep up (and sometimes overtake -> Kamov helicopter) with the US APART from the low observability and Stealth tech.
Despite Glasnost and regular financial problems over the years since then in my view the Russians never raised a doubt about that they "could if they would".
Originally posted by emile
Yes, a part of your said is correct, but I have to tell you that some people drawing some pictures wasn't no resources. They factually work for one or more investigation bureau. Although they are too young to search more advanced prat, but they really knew the origenal direction of design.
As fas as the plan which designed by China but closer to F-22 concern, I have to tell you that code name called 093 but have been dive up. Accoreding to what I knew, Chinese 611 bureau is designing a programe which is more like the picture showed I posted.
Originally posted by American Mad Man
Notice that both aircraft have the EXACT same body. Look at the engines and how they blend into the body of the aircraft. Notice the triangular area that protrudes between both engines. Look also at the shape of the tails. All EXACTLY the same.
If you can't see that, you need to see an eye doctor.
Originally posted by emile
Originally posted by sweatmonicaIdo
Well, if it works for them, I say China has every right to copy as they please. War doesn't care for who was more creative. Only who wins.
But the creative side will have more probability to win the war
Originally posted by jra
They look similar but defiantely not "EXACT". I'd say it's more inspired than a copy. The body looks really differnt to me. It looks more smooth and blended. The space between the tail and the engine is completely differnt. The tails also look like they are more upright then the yf-23's tails. The fuselage is completely differnt as well. So what's really the same? The shape of the tail and the shape of the engines in the back. Whoop-dee-do (Who needs that eye doctor?)
I never undstand all this whining and crying over similar aircraft designs. What's the point in doing that? What does one hope to accomplish other than making themselves look kind of childish.