posted on Oct, 11 2005 @ 02:16 PM
335. 4th Amendment (8/17/05)
These days, Feds activate a wave in Internet to propaganda on "eliminate the wall erected to prevent the sharing information from foreign with
domestic criminal law enforcement." Said the wall caused the success of 911 attack. It's an attack at the Constitution - the 4th amendment. times
Feds set up traps in my case. One was to change the roof of my house. The other one was to change the garage door. I alleged Feds had planted drugs
in my attic and in my garage. They planned to carry out a search and arrest by guise as the roofing or the garage door contractor.
Why couldn't they direct search and arrest? Fourth amendment forbid them to do so. They couldn't apply a search warrant on suspicion. They must have
evidence. But I am innocent man, they have no evidence. What they can do is plant. But for that plant they still need a reason to get a search
Because it's easy for them to get the foreign collaboration to get a "useful" information. Then to get a FISA warrant which is easy to get. An
unreasonable search and arrest could be done if the "information sharing" is allowed.
If the wall was broken, every citizen will lose the protection of the 4th amendment from unreasonable search and arrest. Everyone can be the victim of
Here I repeat the message I posted before. D.O.J. is desperately to attack that protect wall.
Re post: Ashcroft had accused, and now it's his accessories are accusing Jamie Gorelick erected the "wall" between the FBI and the CIA that kept
them from sharing intelligence and possibly from doing more to prevent the 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. That because FBI
feared to touch that wall, they hadn't applied a permission to search suspect Zacarias Moussaoui's computer, so they lost chance to stop the 911
attack in advance.
This is a blackmail.
There are two ways for FBI to apply a search warranty from Judge. One is by FISA court.(Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) In which a warranty is
in a very low standard and is easy to get. The other way is by criminal law court which is in high standard because Americans are protected by 4th
amendment from unreasonable search and arrest.
When Ashcroft and FBI said there is a wall to block sharing information between foreign information and criminal investigation, he is demanding a big
police power expanding which makes the 4th amendment mean nothing. He then can search and arrest American citizen at his will, only based on
suspicion(FISA standard is low) while we should be protected by criminal law from being unreasonable search and arrest. (must based on evidence)
D.O.J. use Moussaoui's case as a reason, said because the FBI feared to touch the wall of criminal law so they didn't investigate Moussaoui's
computer. It's hypocrite and is a misleading. We don't have to be a professional like A.G. or FBI to know that Moussaoui is a foreigner and fits for
FISA. Why FBI hadn't apply FISA(obviously an easy one) but considered the domestic criminal law? And why they even didn't apply? It is incompetence,
a mistake, or a deliberate negligence? Many information revealed that the government knew 911 attack in advance, it was allowed to happen. Because
they benefit from it.
FBI didn't apply a warrant from FISA, they say because they are afraid to touch that wall. A man caught driving without a license. He said because he
was afraid he won't pass the road test so he hadn't apply one. Could a judge justify that reason? As a matter of fact, the FISA standard is very
low, if FBI had applied one, they for sure would get it. But they hadn't.
What D.O.J. wants is to give FBI more police power to search and arrest people. They want to low the standard of criminal law. That's a blackmail in
the name of "war on terrorism".
BTW, there is a deep meaning of "erect the wall of sharing information" . In fact, intelligence share the information already. The reality is they
can't use that information to apply a search warrant because it's illegal. The wall prevent they use FISA standard on domestic criminal case.
Theoretically, FBI can't spy a citizen unless they have evidence the man has committed crime. When this "sharing information wall" is broken, now
they can search a citizen covertly only on suspicion. Because the FISA standard is low.
This is the real purpose of D.O.J.. And it claimed the"Patriot Act" gave it such privilege.
The fact is, under the "Patriot Act", Bush and D.O.J. expand their fascist police power. American people are losing the protect from "unreasonable
search and arrest" of the 4th amendment.
Government and media never tell people about this. They steal the civil liberty in the name of security. You are losing your constitutional right.