2018 Moon Launch? 104 Billion. Wow!!

resistance - ...it just doesn't sink in, does it.

To see the moon more clearly the hubble would need a higher resolution, but it has taken some of the best space pics of galaxies and nebulas ever. They were taken by Nasa...not faked by Nasa.

At least now you have finally excepted that the hubble does in fact have a resolution.

EDIT: I found something better. Just read the link. sm3a.gsfc.nasa.gov...

[edit on 8-11-2005 by Frosty]

[edit on 8-11-2005 by Frosty]

Uh, with Hubble, a high powered telescope can't see the moon... You get those big earth telescopes, they can't see it either, why? Because it is too close! Imagine looking at a billboard from 10 feet away with binoculars used to see something the size of a Bald Eagle from 2 miles away. Can't see the billboard can you?

"To see the moon more clearly the hubble would need a higher resolution, but it has taken some of the best space pics of galaxies and nebulas ever. They were taken by Nasa...not faked by Nasa"

Exactly !

When every wisp of the nebula pictured is several light-years across, you don't see the fact that a higher resolution would give even more detail, but it would.