It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jra
There are lots of things that came out of the Space program. All you have to do is look for it. It's not hard.
Originally posted by sardion2000
Originally posted by jra
There are lots of things that came out of the Space program. All you have to do is look for it. It's not hard.
Here are the links for easy reference
Yahoo Search of "nasa spinoff"(without quotes)
www.sti.nasa.gov...
www.thespaceplace.com...
vesuvius.jsc.nasa.gov...
EDIT: I give up just search nasa spinoff and you'll get
[edit on 5-10-2005 by sardion2000]
[edit on 5-10-2005 by sardion2000]
[edit on 5-10-2005 by sardion2000]
Originally posted by resistance
And it's not even NASA who's making any discoveries. It's the private companies NASA contracts with to provide solutions to their problems that are coming up with these things so NASA is able to get their big spacecraft off the ground and go roaring around in the atmosphere.
Hubbel is a complete waste, can't even photograph the moon.
Hubbel is a complete waste, can't even photograph the moon.
Originally posted by resistance
Technology seems to be moving ahead just fine without NASA's help. And it's not even NASA who's making any discoveries. It's the private companies NASA contracts with to provide solutions to their problems that are coming up with these things so NASA is able to get their big spacecraft off the ground and go roaring around in the atmosphere.
The actual flights themselves produce little or nothing of value that I can see. Hubbel is a complete waste, can't even photograph the moon.
Originally posted by bodebliss
Resistance,
Message from NASA...your hoax debunker were hoaxers
Read it and weep:
science.nasa.gov...
You got fooled, Resistance.
They got you , Man!
www.badastronomy.com...
www.redzero.demon.co.uk...
Originally posted by Astronomer68
I like the direction the new NASA administrator wants to take the agency. The development of a true heavy lift vehicle capable of lofting 100-120 tons into low earth orbit would be a godsend for the space program. They could transport fuel into orbit and thus drastically cut the cost of many of the solar system missions while decreasing the transit times significantly. A truely large space habitat section could even contain a centrifuge to help keep the astronauts healthy for long trips. Plus the capabilities to protect personnel from solar radiation would finally get built. Not to mention that a telescope over twice the aperture of the HST could be sent into orbit and perhaps even the ability to create solar power stations could be started.
Resistance, there isn't any problem with focusing the HST on the Moon. The inability to locate & see the past landing sites doesn't have anything to do with the magnification of the HST either. The HST can magnify something as bright as the moon about 10,000 times. The problem is lack of resolution due to the HST's small aperture. If we had two linked HST's separated by about three kilometers, the landing sites would be visible and resovable by using optical interferometry.
[edit on 8-10-2005 by Astronomer68]
Originally posted by resistance
It's common knowledge that NASA went "rock collecting" on earth
"These two photos seem to have the same mountain backdrop, yet the lunar module is only visible in one of them. Seemingly impossible since the LEM never moved, and its based remained even after the mission. Some suggest the same artificial backdrop was used when shooting two entirely separate pictures."
Originally posted by bodebliss
No Resistance,
In the other two links, they go down the list of the show's evidence and debunk the debunkers as morons who couldn't find their way out of a closet let alone debunk the space program
Originally posted by jra
Any luck with those photos from differnt Apollo missions having the same background yet? Perhaps who ever told you about that, lied or just didn't know any better.
Originally posted by resistance
Yeah. Try this link.
www.geocities.com...