It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JIMC5499
After the US Supreme Court's descision that the police are under no obligation to protect anyone and the existance of terrorist cells in the US, many of the anti-gun arguements just dry up and blow away.
Gonzales vs Castle Rock
I would be interested in how a court would find a suit against a landlord who didn't allow the tennant every opportunity to protect themselves and their property.
Originally posted by scienceguy94
are you telling us that if you were born before 1985 you can legally carry a handgun? WTF?
Originally posted by iori_komei
Because it is our right to own a weapon (guns), and it is an infringement on that constitutional right.
Originally posted by Nygdan
You have no right to bring a gun onto my, or anyone elses, property. The constitution provides for well organized militias, not that you can go anywhere and everywhere with a gun.
ah, see it was settled.
[edit on 5-10-2005 by Nygdan]
Originally posted by URBAN ASSAULT
.................................................
I remain convinced to this day that if I wouldn't have had my gun on me, I probably would have been killed, or at least severley injured. I have never killed another human, nor do I want to... but having that gun was the difference between life and death. It will never leave my side.
[edit on 10/5/2005 by URBAN ASSAULT]
[edit on 10/5/2005 by URBAN ASSAULT]