It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Please spare us your love for this administration.
Now, the bill of rights is a law they are amendments, the Declaration of Independence is not like I said before a law, so it doesn't give you any rights.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Please spare us your love for this administration.
Now, the bill of rights is a law they are amendments, the Declaration of Independence is not like I said before a law, so it doesn't give you any rights.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
No, if you read what I have posted, I said confiscating guns can be legal depending on the circumstances. It doesn't mean the right to bear arms abolished, so stop looking at things in black and white.
The myth of Lincoln is a powerful one owing mainly to his murder and subsequent martyrdom. Had he lived, many believe that his failed national socialist system would be revealed more for the failure it was and is. Once removed from office by the electorate, his many abuses of power and war crimes against humanity would have been exposed by the press. As long as Lincoln was in power, any editorial or reporting critical of his war policies or actions was literally a ticket to jail. Thousands of reporters, editors and publishers were jailed during the war without trial. But since Lincoln was murdered, it became verboten, at least politically, to say or write anything that would besmirch his character. This veil of protection extended to the generals who implemented his policies of "total war," victory at any cost, by any means.
When one considers all that occurred during the very turbulent period of the American Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln is usually considered to be a hero. During his presidency, he managed to keep the United States of America together and gave a people held in bondage, American slaves, the freedom they so desperately deserved. Like almost every president who preceded him, Lincoln's actions at the time were somewhat controversial. Some of his most controversial decisions might actually be considered now to be abuses of the Presidential power. During his terms as president, he suspended the Writ of Habeas Corpus, and upheld the Declaration of Independence above the Constitution.
The writ of Habeas Corpus protects Americans from being unjustly imprisoned. Without it, law is a sham. The writ creates the gap between freedom and despotism. Its origin dates back to the formation of our country, and the tenet that all men have equality under the law. The writ ensures that no on can be unjustly imprisoned. Any prisoner feeling this right is being abused has the ability to petition to be seen before a judge, who can declare his arrest unlawful and have him released. Yet, during the initial year of the American Civil War, Lincoln used his power and removed that right, first in Baltimore, New York, and eventually the entire union. He authorized military officers to suspend the writ before he made an official proclamation. Joshua Kleinfeld, an author who has researched this issue, wrote that "when Lincoln suspended the Writ of Habeas Corpus, he clothed himself with more power then any individual had possessed in America before, or since.
Originally posted by LordBucket
>its something humans coined as an intellectual species
I was actually looking for a response from jmilici, because he appears to be contradicting himself. But, to be sure, I have to know what he means by the words he's using.
I gave my own answer a few pages back.
Originally posted by LordBucket
>its something humans coined as an intellectual species
I was actually looking for a response from jmilici, because he appears to be contradicting himself. But, to be sure, I have to know what he means by the words he's using.
I gave my own answer a few pages back.
1 : qualities (as adherence to duty or obedience to lawful authority) that together constitute the ideal of moral propriety or merit moral approval
4 : the cause of truth or justice
Originally posted by LordBucket
I'm still not sure I follow.
You're saying that if something is a "right" that doesn't mean it is in any way certain, or gaunrunteed by anyone. And it doesn't mean that anyone but you is obligated to try to uphold it. But just that you are entitled to *try* to make it so.
Ok.
So...I therefore have the right to have a supermodel for a girlfriend?
After all, no one is ensuring or gaurunteeing it, but I'm certainly entitled to try and make it happen, right?