It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Tinkleflower
Whilst I appreciate your point, TL, the pictures you've used carry a pretty blatant agenda. Not that this renders the point moot by any means; but rather they're produced as a sort of "scare tactic";
you call it a baby, I call it a fetus. Neither is more "right" than the other, realistically.
Originally posted by TrueLies
ps: It's a baby ... not a fetus.
In a ruling dated Monday, U.S. District Court Judge Denise Page Hood (search) in Detroit ruled the law places an "undue burden" on women's right to choose an abortion. The parties in the lawsuit learned of the ruling Wednesday.
Hood also said the law is confusing and vague, and its exceptions for the health or life of the mother are meaningless and unconstitutional.
"The act does not describe any specific procedure to be banned," Hood wrote. "The act also does not distinguish between induced abortion and pregnancy loss."
Originally posted by TrueLies
Not a scare tactic, rather your intrepretation of it. Let's not play semantics, the issue at hand is partial birth abortion, for those that don't know how the procedure is performed they can use those diagrams as a guide.
Fetus: In humans, the unborn young from the end of the eighth week after conception to the moment of birth, as distinguished from the earlier embryo.
So at the end of the 8th week, what word would you like to use to describe the 'thing'?
Originally posted by Tinkleflower
I don't "agree" with D&X either!
But I don't want the government telling someone else - who might, for example, be carrying a dead fetus - that she can't have one.
I truly hate that the procedure is performed at all; but that's my personal opinion, and it should never become the basis of overturning a matter which has already been addressed in the courts.
Originally posted by TrueLies
I don't understand however the dead fetus part... what do you mean the government tells people who carry a dead fetus around that they can't have an abortion?
I thought Bush signed the pba act back in 2003 to make it illegal?
and now michigan over turned the state law? what government superceeds the other? state?
Originally posted by Tinkleflower
He had no right to sign such a bill to start with...that's what I was saying, really
The procedure should never have been made illegal (whether or not I like the idea).
Originally posted by kenshiro2012
Mayhaps what is needed is that the gov needs to reword the law so that it will just ban the D&E procedure except for use in the most extreme cases where there IS NOT a viable alternative.
The procedure itself as per DR. Koop and the OB-GYN community is not a procedure that is needed.
The policy statement noted that although a select panel convened by ACOG could identify no circumstances under which intact D&X would be the only option to protect the life or health of a woman, intact D&X "may be the best or most appropriate procedure in a particular circumstance to save the life or preserve the health of a woman