This topic is in the Aircraft Projects discussion forum.  (rss)


B-2 to be upgraded to stealthy AESA radars




Topic started on 13-9-2005 @ 12:28 PM by NWguy83



Northrop Grumman and Raytheon have reached three milestones in a program to modernize the B-2 stealth bomber's radar system with an advanced, more reliable antenna. These achievements represent significant progress towards initial flight testing of the radar.
In recent weeks, the B-2 radar-modernization team passed a final design review by the U.S. Air Force; delivered the first test model of the radar for integration, test and software development and completed a suite of tests that proves the hardware and software work together as one subsystem.

Northrop Grumman, prime contractor for the overall B-2 program, also leads the radar-modernization team that includes Raytheon, the radar-system provider. The effort will replace the current antenna with an active, electronically scanned array (AESA) antenna.

"Radar modernization is one of a series of programs Northrop Grumman and the Air Force are conducting to enhance the B-2's ability to respond to emerging worldwide threats as a key element of the military's network-centric warfare concept," said Gene Fraser, vice president and B-2 program manager at Northrop Grumman's Integrated Systems sector.


Article link


Now I just wish they would make the B-2 supersonic.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-9-2005 @ 02:22 PM by mxboy15u


The B-2 has no need to be supersonic, and its shape does not lend itself kindly to shockwaves. That is what the B-1 is for.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-9-2005 @ 12:04 AM by NWguy83



Originally posted by mxboy15u
The B-2 has no need to be supersonic, and its shape does not lend itself kindly to shockwaves. That is what the B-1 is for.


Yes, but if it could go supersonic then it could get to it's targets faster.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-9-2005 @ 12:11 AM by FredT


Yeah not as simplistic as that. Fuel consumption is one issue, then factor in the heat signature which would be dramaticaly increased, even if you could get it to super cruise.

The better deal is a hypersonic crusie missile.

However, the AESA radar is a good fit, but does it really use it during the pneatration phase........ No

I wonder if it will reduce the RCS a bit like it did on the F-15's??

[edit on 9/14/05 by FredT]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-9-2005 @ 01:02 AM by Zaphod58


It probably will actually. The two biggest RCS factors in a head on engagement are the radar antenna and the pilots helmet of all things. That's why the F-117 and the B-2 had RAM added to the canopy. That's what I was told by some F-117 guys once anyway.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Find More:





Top Topics Right Now:






Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:












ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

, , , , , , , , ,
















ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 1.088 seconds
Page processed in 0.222 seconds
8 total database queries (2)









( The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC. )





thread