Bush accepts full responsibility for Katrina response., page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 13-9-2005 @ 03:22 PM by Conspicuouz
Originally posted by Timcouchfanclub
If we want the Federal Government to solve everything then why do we have State and Local Governments?

[edit on 13-9-2005 by Timcouchfanclub]


your sounding like a mouth piece to what republicans have been saying through all this.
why do we have federal government? ah yes, to assist in needs that are too big for the local and state .. and that's why i get taxed more by them for that security.

look at this objectively, try to not use FOX opinions to base your own opinion of the matter. yes the local govt. couldve assisted aid 1-2 days before more before the storm hit and maybe they wouldve gotten there in time (if you believe 1 day isn't enough pre-warning to have the best nation in the world deploy aid in a region in their own back yard) and prevented some of the horrors we are seeing on tv.

even the real aftermath which was the levee collapsing causing it the flood couldve been prevented on a federal level if it got the money it needed to complete it. which i hope you know well by now was cut by the current administration.

even the president, a man who has never taken blame for anything negative, has now spoken out to say it's his fault and he's going to try to fix this for the future. which i don't personally believe he was being sincere, more like cutting his losses and hope for some compassion from the country.



reply posted on 13-9-2005 @ 06:51 PM by Conspicuouz
Originally posted by Timcouchfanclub
Well lets talk about the past. How about the fact that the City should have never have been there in the first place. Or that The Mississippi was redirected to go through NO. The city was destined for destruction a long time ago.


lets

so a great strategical port of a city shouldn't even be there in the first place? i find that quite odd. can i presume your also saying you hold no compassion to the people who lived in the area because they were silly enough to live in a city below sea level? and if memory serves me right they are other cities out there that exist that live below sea level and they are doing just fine.

so this city was destined for destruction, i wonder why this administration didn't take heed of this knowledge and stop it's cuts to prevent a large scale destruction by actually allowing the levees to be finished to it's requested heights, thus avoiding this whole situation in it's entirety.

let's do some math, shall we?

the army corps requested 11 million to maintain and add to the levee system (only got 5)
we have now requested over 50 billion to help reconstruct

see the fatal mistake?

we don't live in a utopian society. some land characteristics have to be worked around to maintain life on it and we as humans are able to create things to prevent nature's wrath and still live in those places.

this was a failure in many levels, none to be given to the inhabitants of the region because it was a place that, if funded properly, was able to withstand a catagory 4 hurricane for a few hours with an underfunded system.


reply posted on 14-9-2005 @ 09:13 AM by Timcouchfanclub

If there is in fact any national emergency plan (and we the taxpayer sure expected there to be one, in the view of possible terrorist attacks etc), why wasn't it implemented? Where did the money go? What does the HS dept do? Collects paychecks


Good question. Where did the money go? Before 9/11 there was virtually no evac plans setup in cities. After 9/11 the Federal Government sent out money to get these plans or "Exit" strategies in place. That was something that had to be done on a State and Local level. There is no way the federal government could have done it all. I am sure that FEMA probably assisted in the process. Now I am guessing that probably just like every other state that money went to other things and hardly any went to an evac plan. In fact I am 100% sure. Because if you read New Orleans evac plan in a nut shell it says personal veichles will be the primary way out. Then they would use other veichles ( school buses..ect) to get everyone else out. WoW!!! I am sure those great thoughts took millions of dollars.



the army corps requested 11 million to maintain and add to the levee system (only got 5)


They admitted that levee was NEVER going to withstand above a level 3 hurricane.



so a great strategical port of a city shouldn't even be there in the first place? i find that quite odd. can i presume your also saying you hold no compassion to the people who lived in the area because they were silly enough to live in a city below sea level? and if memory serves me right they are other cities out there that exist that live below sea level and they are doing just fine.


You are right there are other areas below sea level in the United States. 3 to be exact. Only one is populated...New Orleans. the others are Death Valley and a Lake in Texas where the Rio Grande goes into the Gulf. Of course they are doing Ok. No one lives there.

americasroof.com...


I must be a bad reader because I couldn't find the part in my post where I said I have no compassion for the people. You completely missed the point. People want to bring up the past then lets look at the past. That city was doomed when the Army Core of engineers redirected the Mississippi to go through New Orleans in order to maintain it being a large Port. I never blaimed the citizens one bit. I say we quit worrying about the blame and worry about the future of this city. It is a terrible place to have a city but we made it into One of the largest import and export ports in the world. We kind of need it.

What are you all trying to accomplish by pointing the finger??
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



San Onofre Ready To Blow Anytime
  Posted 10 days ago with 4 member flags
Radiation Network 2/2/12 website image not loading
  Posted 10 days ago with 0 member flags