This topic is in the Aircraft Projects discussion forum.  (rss)


Photo of a pulse detonation engine in action




Topic started on 6-9-2003 @ 05:48 PM by jetsetter


Here is a photo of a pulse detonation in action:


external image

photo of the engine:

external image

For more info go to www.popsci.com...

[Edited on 6-9-2003 by jetsetter]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-9-2003 @ 05:54 PM by jetsetter


OK, I believe that pulse detonation-jet hybrids will become the engines of the future for aviation. What do you guys think?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-9-2003 @ 10:39 PM by Seekerof


Jetsetter.....I believe and its of my own opinion that this engine type is already in use.

regards
seekerof



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-9-2003 @ 10:55 PM by FULCRUM



Originally posted by Seekerof
Jetsetter.....I believe and its of my own opinion that this engine type is already in use.

regards
seekerof


Yeah, like i said in ATS chat allready.. about 12h earlier: V-1 had "pulse-engine".



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-9-2003 @ 10:57 PM by jetsetter


That wasn't really a real pulse detonation engine.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-9-2003 @ 10:59 PM by Seekerof


And I wasn't refering to the V-1 either....

regards
seekerof



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-9-2003 @ 11:02 PM by jetsetter


I think you are talking about the Aurora spy plane. I dont think thoughs donut on a rope contrails are from a pulse detonation engine. I believe the type of engine that the Aurora would use would leave a contrial with the donuts alot closer toghther. The pulse detonation fires at about 80 times a second.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 7-9-2003 @ 01:27 AM by FULCRUM



Originally posted by jetsetter
That wasn't really a real pulse detonation engine.


PULSE ENGINE, IS A PULSE ENGINE. "Tech" of that pulse is secondary.

I really dont give a..

*note*

Btw.. one would think that a rocket engine would be much more useful, as it doesnt give "80 detonations per sec" but continiuos trusht..

[Edited on 7-9-2003 by FULCRUM]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-9-2003 @ 07:36 AM by DaRAGE


ACtually it's much better to have pulse detonations. More power.

Even the Nazi's knew this. They had an engine that fired repeatedly over and over again.....



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-9-2003 @ 10:23 AM by THENEO


Pulsing likely means more fuel efficiency too, therefore more range.

It may also mean an engine that has a longer life, eg. less stresses?

does anyone know if this is the case?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-9-2003 @ 11:10 AM by Sanders



Originally posted by THENEO
Pulsing likely means more fuel efficiency too, therefore more range.

It may also mean an engine that has a longer life, eg. less stresses?

does anyone know if this is the case?


How would a pulsing-type of thrust induce less stress on an engine? If anything, there would be more stress induced from the constant intertial changes that wouldn't be present under constant-thrust circumstances.... i.e. me smacking your back 80 times a second to move you hurts a lot less than me just pushing you.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-9-2003 @ 09:42 PM by groingrinder


Yeah that's right! Why let the government guys and the corporate geeks have all the fun.

HOMEMADE JET1

HOMEMADE GAS TURBINE ENGINES

THE JUNKYARD TURBOJET



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:
































ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.959 seconds
Page processed in 0.276 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread
Forums Directory