Bush's Re-election Numbers Still Going South

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join

posted on Sep, 6 2003 @ 01:16 AM
link   
CNN release their latest poll today revealing a wider crack in the teflon.

Definately for Bush 29%
Definately against Bush 41%


Some 41 percent of all registered voters say they will definitely vote against Bush; just 29 percent say they will definitely vote for him. So Bush must woo about seven in ten swing voters -- not a difficult task for a popular incumbent, but far from a certainty.


Wow! His support has really softened. While I find this to be the first good news in several days, it also scares me. How much longer until a Rove-induced incident?




posted on Sep, 6 2003 @ 02:08 AM
link   
Glad to see that the American Public is actually seeing what a lying jackanape Bush is...

...The thing that scares me nearly as much is: Are the alternative candidates going to be any better?...

According to what I've seen at the level of federal government, the best vote I can give is "No Confidence".



posted on Sep, 6 2003 @ 10:28 AM
link   
Maybe that's why we're having the Bush Sunday Terror speech on an "impending attack?"



posted on Sep, 6 2003 @ 12:08 PM
link   
I can see bush re-starting another war just in time, so they Can not have another election.



posted on Sep, 6 2003 @ 02:09 PM
link   
Oh come on, Bush lost the last race for president and is president, what makes you think it won't happen again?

The GOP shafted America last election by "misplacing" votes and by votes from strong democratic areas being "wrong" since the people were to stupid to vote. I still love how no one remembers how the three most democratic counties in Florida are the ones who just happen to be to stupid to vote according to Bush's brother and so a recount started throwing out several thousand votes for Gore. Then a bunch of military votes just dissapeared in Republican controlled states when the military was known to support Gore.

Anyways, Bush Lied, Cheated and Stole last time. So no reason to believe he won't again.


ID

posted on Sep, 6 2003 @ 04:32 PM
link   


I can see bush re-starting another war just in time, so they Can not have another election.
If this was the case, and it seems very likely that it is. I would have to say that North Korea is the only viable "next target." I for one believe in war but only for wars that have purpose. I for one would die for my country and be bled dry for the people in it, but I would not so much as lift a finger to assist our present government in war for reelection. If north Korea becomes an actual threat (I know they have nukes but they cannot launch them yet) then I would be more then happy to help riddle their country with an M16.



posted on Sep, 6 2003 @ 07:00 PM
link   
Its good people now distrust Bush. Hopefully, well have a third party upset in this election like the ones in 92 and 2000.

Now we see what Bush will pull out of his hat.........


ID

posted on Sep, 6 2003 @ 09:21 PM
link   


Now we see what Bush will pull out of his hat.........
Despert times call for despert measures. Those with power will do anything to hold onto it. Princess Lea said it best: The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers. I believe this will hold true as it pretains to G.W.



posted on Sep, 7 2003 @ 10:38 AM
link   
The truly sad thing is that we have no decent candidate running against him. The democrats are all a bunch of losers. This is as pathetic as when we had a choice between Bubba Klinton and Bob "3rd Person" Dole.

I'm about ready to drop politics and take up gardening as a hobby. Its much more exciting and productive!



posted on Sep, 7 2003 @ 11:35 AM
link   
Thats completely the wrong attitude Tom. You cannot admit defeat until the enemy has you chained in a dungeon and has began to remove your balls (Women do not have this problem, and therefore never admit defeat). And even as a eunuch you can fight. There are no appealing candidates for you because you only see what they want you to see. If you are so fed up with the major candidates, find a third party one that supports you`re views. And don`t just vote for him, volunteer for him. Be an active participant in his campaign, publicize him (or her). And it won`t be completely useless either, judging by your views, your candidate would take votes from Bush.

Or, as many Bush detractors are doing, you would believe that almost anyone would be better than bush. Dont look for a candidate that is exactly like you. Just compromise, after all compromising is the basis of democracy. No one can get exactly what they want through democracy so they compromise. I think that Howard Dean might be a likely choice for you, he is much more conservative than most democrats think. He supported the first gulf war, he supports the second amendment, he would be the perfect choice for you. I dont like Dean myself, but I think that almost any Democratic candidate would be better than the bumbling fool we have now. And by democratic I mean that one that supports a representative democractic process, something that bush does not do. I say almost, because people like pat buchanan and Donald Trump scare me.

Good luck finding your faith in politics and the American system of Government again Tom.

XAOS



posted on Sep, 7 2003 @ 04:35 PM
link   
Too bad we can't vote yes or no.



posted on Sep, 7 2003 @ 09:39 PM
link   
Just saw an Reuters pole which show's President Bush's aproval rating is down from 63% to 52%.



posted on Sep, 8 2003 @ 12:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by Toltec
Just saw an Reuters pole which show's President Bush's aproval rating is down from 63% to 52%.




Does it neccesarily mean that someone would vote for Bush just because they say "approve" of him? That's not a rhetorical question, I really wonder about that...



posted on Sep, 8 2003 @ 03:05 PM
link   
Dean and Kerry both stink of the NWO. They are not better choices than Bush.

Vote third party. get your minds off this ridiculous two party system, otherwise, why bother?

If we keep looking at the two parties that have continuously #ed up America for the past 100 years and have secret society connections, then youre not doing any good.

Look well into the third parties.

1. Libertarian
2. Peace and freedom party (not TCs choice by far
)
3. Green party
4. America First party
5. Democratic socialists (ewwww...but I am giving even press to all parties regardless of how revolting)
6. Communist party (can see TC vomit)
7. Nazi party (were all grabbing our guns now)
8. Independant running candidates

There are so mant friggin political parties out there that probably would hit head on to most of what a person believes in. the democrats and republicans are the property of the NWO: continuing to elect them into office, and youre sealing our fate.

You wanna fight the NWO? Then why are you electing its agents into your govornment offices?



posted on Sep, 8 2003 @ 07:53 PM
link   
Add Cascadia Party to that list.

What about Kucinich?



posted on Sep, 8 2003 @ 08:30 PM
link   
I'm going to vote Libertarian. Are Harry Browne and Michael Badnarik the only ones running in that party?

Badnarik's stance on the issues look damn good to me. I think I like this guy. He seems to share my views on the issues.


According to the Declaration, the reason people create any government at all is to secure and protect their unalienable rights. There is no other reason for its existence. In fact the Declaration points out that when any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it.


www.badnarik.org...



[Edited on 9-9-2003 by Satyr]



posted on Oct, 1 2003 @ 01:52 PM
link   
This is alarming...

Bush's approval rating in NY is now 42-53. Wow!!! The last time the poll was taken...52-42.


New York State voters have sent President George W. Bush's approval plummeting to its lowest rating ever, 42 -- 53 percent, as several Democratic contenders now beat the Republican incumbent, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today.

President Bush had a 52 -- 42 percent approval rating in New York State in a June 26 survey by the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University. Bush's previous low was a 44 -- 47 percent approval in New York State in June, 2001.


www.quinnipiac.edu...



posted on Oct, 1 2003 @ 02:54 PM
link   
Comes to NY, for that fascist group hug masqeurading as a Republican Convention, moved to be nice & close to the 9/11 anniversary......his numbers will be the least of his worries.



posted on Oct, 1 2003 @ 05:04 PM
link   
bouttime
Quote"James Madison and Thomas Jefferson spoke of the fear that economic power would one day seize political power. That fear has been realized with the Bush administration."
It started in the late 1800's and FDR capitalized on it.



posted on Oct, 2 2003 @ 12:41 PM
link   
But it doesn't show because of the avatar.





top topics
 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join