Future of U.S. Military Bases in CONUS, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 10-9-2005 @ 01:05 AM by StarChild
President Bush now must decide whether to accept a commission's proposal to close or reorganize some U.S. military bases, reject the plan altogether or send it back for more work.

The nine-member Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission forwarded its final report to the president late Thursday after signing off on roughly 86 percent of what the Pentagon had recommended as it sought to save money by getting rid of extra space in the domestic military network.

The report arrived at the White House only after the commission, in response to a federal judge's ruling, withdrew a recommendation that called for moving the 103rd Fighter Wing's jets from Connecticut's Bradley Air National Guard base to Massachusetts.

Connecticut was among a number of states that had gone to court seeking to stop the commission's plan.

More than 800 Army, Navy and Air Force facilities across the country will grow, shrink or close under the commission-amended proposal.

But Bush still could reject the report altogether or send it back to the commission for more changes, although either of those options would open him up to criticism when his poll numbers are low and his administration is taking heat for its response to Hurricane Katrina.

Last week, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld expressed reservations about the panel's decisions to keep several major bases open and said he was uncertain whether he would recommend that the president accept the proposed closures as modified by the commission.



So, what is the real motive behind the submission of this report to the President? Also, why place the sole decision in the hands of Bush? We've all seen the consequences of that mistake.


MNM


www.military.com...
mod edit to add BB quote code

[edit on 5-10-2005 by DontTreadOnMe]


reply posted on 10-9-2005 @ 05:15 AM by FLYIN HIGH
I know now that post Katrina, the bases would be the start of a good thing to house the people that were left homeless and effected by the largest natural diaster to hit our nation. Even before Katrina, I felt that these base closings were going to be bad for the country not only in econimic terms but also from a national security issue. I can see the day after this current administraion is long gone, these bases would come in handy just as they should in Katrina's wake. In these days and times closing these bases should be cause enoungh to make the citizens of our country demand the govt. keep them open and in such a state of rediness that they could be used to help in any natural diaster. What in the hell is Bush thinking of? Oh, I know. He is trying to save money where he can to put it in with the hundreds of billions that are going to Iraq and that other 'stan. I think he is shooting himself in the foot by doing this but hey, this is his last trip around the circut as Prez. These bases are needed if not now but for sure in the future. Sure it takes money to keep them open, but can't he make budget cuts in other areas of the Fed. budget? It is my understanding that the most recent fed. budget was laden with $39 billion going for pet pork projects for the current round of crooks, I mean lawmakers in D.C. I sure wish the govt. would give me a grant of $1million to study the mating habits of the red-eyed newt. Bush in not being a good president. Bad W, bad W.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



F-22 Pilots Told Not to Talk
  Posted 18 days ago with 23 member flags
Several military convoys traveling through Kittery, Maine
  Posted 19 days ago with 6 member flags
Eglin Air Force Base hangar Foam Party!
  Posted 9 days ago with 4 member flags
Space weapons / Anonymous / Afghan War plan
  Posted 3 days ago with 4 member flags