there's not enough proof out there to say terrorists slammed 3 airplanes into buildings.
... there's too much CONFLICTING information to specifically LABEL Them as the culprits.
I mean, wouldnt you just directly go for the whitehouse with 3 planes?
The terrorists ambition IS to remove troops from the middle east..
so if terrorists REALLY did hit the USA.. wouldnt a honest and decent president realised how vulnerable they were to mass attack... and start changing
there foreign policy.. instead of sending in hunderds of thousands of troops straight nito the middleast... and then claiming the worlds safer, even
tho youve done the ONE thing your terrorists SUPPOSIDLY hit your for
It doesnt make sense.
Something is fishy with terrosist theory,
I mean being the president won an election considered by all to be rigged
being all the terrorist evidence from the tradecentres was sealed and hidden from the public
being the pentagon looks more like a missle strike rather than a plane attack
and being the US Was CERTAIN with cold hard PROOF iraq had wmds and was behind sept11 in one way or another.. which ALL turned out to be complete
What else do you need to believe this is all a government chirade?
Ive yet to see ONE thing come from the US government which turned out to be.. CORRECT!
The US government controls the media, and therefore will only show what helps there story..
doesnt matter the suicide plane hijackers that supposidly slammed the planes into buildings are as we speak protesting in there countries taht they
are very much alive... the US government dosnt care? hell they havent even achnolodged it.
And thats why terrorists is just a smokescreen created by the US government.
Thast why, since sept11 there havent been any attacks..
BUT they are always capable of releasing video's right at the MOST opportune time for the government.