posted on Sep, 5 2003 @ 12:26 AM
THIS SEEMS HEADED into the territory OF ENDLESS SPECULATION
Q::: RELIABLE info..mation?
Q:: CREDIBLE sources ??
fur instance, the Intel community...discarded 9-11
info from several 'whistle blowers', O'Neil, mr. G...
(go to...www. the truth seeker. co. uk...etc etc...)
also, the Intel community (FBI, CIA, NSA...) trashed
or burried or left to languish, out-sourced 'tip' letters
and other correspondence & reports, RE: 9-11
all-of-which-were::::: non-CREDIBLE sources:::
and deemed ::::::::UNRELIABLE INFORMATION:
So-Much-For...THE culture of data assessments, found within (our) CIA ,FBI ,NSA , Naval/Army Intels etc.
their same old, rubber-stamp approval of certain data::
ascretained by procedure & name recognition? EQUALS-->::RELIABLE & CREDIBLE sources !!!???
****the GLARING PROBLEM is........W.M.D. not found,
or evidenced to exist at time of INVASION .by. US/UK
but thats' another story****example 2****
BUT< this carousel of speculation> can be better operated.... using the 5 noted posts as evidence, one could then......
analyse the the grammer, syntax, nuances...all the
information contained in the messages themselves//
ADDITIONALLY....the edits & dates & such--> might be seen
in 2 different 'lights'...#1: as part of the 'clue' or as #2: exteraneous data/information (having to do with a
my own, topsey-turvey, illogical, quantum-head, speculation ---->S.R.71, the high flying spy craft,
might be a lead t....