I just got back from a FEMA Detainment Camp, page 25
Pages: <<  22    23    24    25    26    27    28  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 20 times


reply posted on 18-3-2006 @ 12:58 PM by WyrdeOne
There's also a growing problem, unfolding in the trailer parks set up and maintained by FEMA. Not exactly a detainment camp, but read on...

This is a good report from ABC, I'm thinking of giving it its own thread, whadya think?


abcnews.go.com...

On a bleak stretch of gravelly pasture not far from the airport in Baton Rouge, La., 573 white aluminum trailers stand in rows. The dreary site, home to 3,000 evacuees from Hurricane Katrina, boasts a utopian name: Renaissance Village.

But life is anything but utopian for those inside the Village, the first and largest trailer park founded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. The absence of land-line phones, hospital facilities and a police presence serve as constant reminders that their status here is temporary.

Magee, like many at the site, is from New Orleans' lower Ninth Ward. She worked in day care before Katrina, but she is unemployed now; she spends much of her day watching television in her trailer with her three young children. The oldest, 5-year-old Sapphire, is one of the hundreds of children who doesn't go to school. Magee said no one explained to her how to register. Magee says she is trapped in the trailer, out of options. She has no job, no money and no car, and yet she does not qualify for government assistance. "We called section 8 to see if they could help — they say you have to be homeless," Magee said. "I am homeless. This is not mine."

Yet many say that the occupants of Renaissance Village are not so bad off. As the largest of the temporary housing sites, the Village attracts a lot of attention. T-Mobile has donated cell phones, a charity called the Virtue Foundation brought $60,000 worth of computers, and Rosie O'Donnell's For All Kids Foundation donated three trailers to serve as school and play space for the children.

But O'Donnell's trailers, which arrived in December, have remained locked outside the gates. FEMA won't let them in, citing liability concerns.


Interesting, no?

Some will say, why can't these folks find jobs. Probably for the same reasons most people can't, there aren't very many.

But at least they get free buses to spend their federal money at Wally World. That's comforting. These people aren't alone. There are a lot more like 'em, everywhere from Texas to Missouri to Florida, and beyond.

Maybe Halliburton can 'help' them learn that work is freedom...


[edit on 18-3-2006 by WyrdeOne]


reply posted on 18-3-2006 @ 01:24 PM by loam
WyrdeOne:

Then you'll love this story:



Couple Discovers High Levels Of Formaldehyde In FEMA Trailer


A Bay St. Louis couple has discovered a dangerous problem with their FEMA trailer. And that problem could have widespread implications to the health of anyone living in one.

Paul and Melondy Stewart say tests show there's formaldehyde inside their trailer, at levels two times what is considered acceptable by the Environmental Protection Agency.

...

"Exposure to formaldehyde over the long term will cause lung cancer, nose cancer, throat cancer. Formaldehyde is a carcinogen. It's listed as a carcinogen by the government and exposure of high levels of it can cause cancer."

More...



I particularly love this part:



He asked FEMA to test his trailer.

When FEMA didn't respond, the Stewarts took matters into their own hands.



What a surprise...

You know, I in no way think there is a plot to "kill" Katrina victims, but when you see dozens of stories like the ones Valhall, you and I find, it's so easy to see why so many people do.

In the end, it really makes you wonder what the hell is going on.


reply posted on 18-3-2006 @ 01:37 PM by WyrdeOne

You know, I in no way think there is a plot to "kill" Katrina victims, but when you see dozens of stories like the ones Valhall, you and I find, it's so easy to see why so many people do.

In the end, it really makes you wonder what the hell is going on.


Yeah, tend to agree with you. Sometimes it does appear that there's a decisive eugenics agenda, but most of the time it seems quite a lot less sinister than all that. Just straight greed and oppurtunism.

Why are contractors hiring illegals instead of displaced refugees? Because it's profitable.

Why did the government give them fish instead of teaching them how to fish, when it's been well established all throughout history that the former is temporary and inefficient, and the latter is endorsed by this guy!



The thing is..a dependant population is a subservient population.

That's the goal. I think the elite are smart enough to realize that if they kill all the peasants, there will be nobody to work the fields. Their interest is in keeping people down, and whipped, and defeated, but they can't very well kill the people who make their beds and their meals and their appointments and their food.

Not yet anyway. Automation is the single greatest incentive any society has ever had to eliminate the peasants. That temptation may be calling people..I don't know.


reply posted on 10-6-2006 @ 03:37 AM by HarlemHottie
Originally posted by WheelsRCool
Hmm, I think it is kind fo silly to expect an initial camp for such a disaster to run perfectly smoothly. There's tons of logistics and communications involved.

This is FEMA, a government agency that's supposed to know what they're doing. I don't believe they're as stupid as they look. If they didn't know what to do, they should have found people who did, instead of declining help when it was offered.


Pretty much all disasters involve some sort of martial law being established to keep things okay. If people didn't expect things to be somewhat repressive when arriving at these camps, then I don't know what they were expecting.

They would expect the rights afforded to citizens of the United States. Why should the rules of human decency change when there's a disaster?


One thing about Americans is that they don't like socialism, yet when a disaster happens, everyone expects socialism from the government.

No, they expect a return on the tax-payer dollars they give to a democratic government.


As for the government, one basic fact for any disaster situation: DO NOT count on the government to provide help.

People keep saying that... and I think they're wrong. THAT, my friend, is the point of government. Otherwise, what good is FEMA? Otherwise, we'd have anarchy, and when someone broke into your house, you wouldn't be able to call the police.

FEMA's sole duty is to respond to disasters in a way so as not to kill the presumably fortunate surviors of said disasters.



reply posted on 11-6-2006 @ 09:41 PM by WheelsRCool
Originally posted by HarlemHottie
Originally posted by WheelsRCool
Hmm, I think it is kind fo silly to expect an initial camp for such a disaster to run perfectly smoothly. There's tons of logistics and communications involved.

This is FEMA, a government agency that's supposed to know what they're doing. I don't believe they're as stupid as they look. If they didn't know what to do, they should have found people who did, instead of declining help when it was offered.


Pretty much all disasters involve some sort of martial law being established to keep things okay. If people didn't expect things to be somewhat repressive when arriving at these camps, then I don't know what they were expecting.

They would expect the rights afforded to citizens of the United States. Why should the rules of human decency change when there's a disaster?


One thing about Americans is that they don't like socialism, yet when a disaster happens, everyone expects socialism from the government.

No, they expect a return on the tax-payer dollars they give to a democratic government.


As for the government, one basic fact for any disaster situation: DO NOT count on the government to provide help.

People keep saying that... and I think they're wrong. THAT, my friend, is the point of government. Otherwise, what good is FEMA? Otherwise, we'd have anarchy, and when someone broke into your house, you wouldn't be able to call the police.

FEMA's sole duty is to respond to disasters in a way so as not to kill the presumably fortunate surviors of said disasters.


The rules have to change somewhat when there's a disaster. It is impossible to distribute food and medical care without some enforcement, and that enforcement requires some established rules until things settle down. And no, that is not necessarily the job of the government, at least not the Federal government. The Federal government's job is international problems mostly, otherwise it gets to large. The state government is supposed to handle such disasters.


reply posted on 12-6-2006 @ 05:05 AM by Relentless
Here's an update on a Texas Town that will never recover from Rita. The bulk of the displaced residents are in no position to rebuild and their FEMA trailers are not going to be there forever.

my.earthlink.net.../448ce6c0_3421_13345200606121921897195

FEMA has told displaced families it wants its trailers back in March - an impossible deadline for many, considering those that can afford to rebuild are just now seeing construction materials delivered to their lawns by overwhelmed contractors.


FEMA hasn't solved anything for these people, it's just a bandaid for now and who knows what when it's all said and done.
Pages: <<  22    23    24    25    26    27    28  >>    ^^TOP^^



San Onofre Ready To Blow Anytime
  Posted 9 days ago with 4 member flags
Radiation Network 2/2/12 website image not loading
  Posted 9 days ago with 0 member flags