I just got back from a FEMA Detainment Camp, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 20 times


reply posted on 6-9-2005 @ 05:32 AM by Valhall
Originally posted by CatHerder
Ok, so let me get things straight.

Number 1: the camps were empty and there was not a single disaster victim there - and you took no photos of any


Correct.


Number 2: everyone going to this camp will have next to no posessions or no posessions at all


That's what we've been told.


Number 3: the police allowed you in,


Correct.

But the police did not tell me the following. The "hosts" did.


and told you that you couldn't leave different types of food or clothing otherwise somebody sometime might consider that to be unfair (that they didn't get the same "treat" their neighbour had)


Correct. Only they stated this might cause a riot.


and you couldn't leave food that needed to be cooked so they wouldn't have to worry about accidental fires burning anything down and causing even more grief for the disaster victims and FEMA's reputation


No - they did not tell me this. Though I stated "because of fire hazard" in my original article, they stated FEMA would not allow anyone to use the kitchen facilities in the cabins "due to liability issues". I believe that's different.


Number 4: there are some ambulances, and EMTs at the "main cabin"- and you took some photos of them


There is no main cabin. They were located very close to the main gate and to the cabin in which the soldiers were at.


Number 5: there is a fire truck or two - and you took some photos of them


Very good.


Number 6: staff onsite had cellphone radios and a local satellite tower for communications - and you took some photos of it


I think I specifically said she did NOT get a pick of the comm tower, didn't I?


Number 7: there are state police at the entrance - and you took photos of their vehicles


As well as soldiers. They were located just inside the main gate.



Well gosh, you sure got me there. This totally sounds like mistreated hostages in an internment camp. Where are your photos of the barbed wire and minefields?


You're easily gotten, apparently. Why would they need barbed wire and minefields?


You were suprised and shocked that they didn't want to accept your clothes and food donations even though they've been saying on the TV and radio and websites for a few days that anyone wanting to donate should "donate money" or volunteer time with the Red Cross or their local church organization(s)?


This WAS with my "local church organization". The cabin we were stocking was our church's cabin.


Could it possibly be that you are jumping to conclusions and over-sensationalizing things similar to what you did with the volcanic activity in Washington state a while back? As I recall you were "extremely alarmed" yet (as all the scientists said it would) it vented some gas and let off a minor eruption.


What have I over sensationalized? I told exactly what we saw and exactly what was told us by the workers at the camp. Do you think I oversensationalized because I called it a detainment camp? Please provide the appropriate name for a camp which is guarded by state police and the military, and in which you cannot have visitors, nor can you leave unless you leave on foot - at least 8 miles from no where in a place you're unfamiliar with - and to which you cannot return if you do leave.


and perhaps donate money to a disaster charity.


I've already done that.

[edit on 9-6-2005 by Valhall]


reply posted on 6-9-2005 @ 05:44 AM by Valhall
Originally posted by mOjOm
Does it seem to strange to anyone else that within a matter of days FEMA has leased this whole place, set up complete communications, security, staff, organized id and housing systems, setup a system of rules which everyone has already been trained to understand, prepared organized buckets of toys for the kiddies, racks of clothes, etc. etc. etc...???


All the supplies in all the cabins have been donated by the citizens of Oklahoma. The buckets full of toys were made up by the church members of the McAlester church. In our cabin there were similar buckets with special items in them made up for the men who would be staying there. That's why we were there. To supply the cabin for the occupants. We had hoped to be there after some of the occupants had arrived so that we could learn individual special needs from some of them, but they weren't there yet. Since they were to arrive last night some time, and we were told starting today no one without credentials would be allowed in, I'm glad we got everything done this weekend.


For a government agency that didn't even show up until almost a week after the crisis hit, it sure seems a bit odd that something like this would come together so well so soon.


Actually I believe the preparation has been done by the Oklahoma Department of Safety (the Oklahoma Highway Patrol). And I believe the place is leased by the OHP to be used by FEMA because that's pretty much how the host said it. He said "you no longer own this cabin, FEMA does. For the next 5 months." And my mom asked for clarification "You mean they leased it." And he said, "The Oklahoma highway patrol did - lock, stock and barrel." That's almost verbatim how he said it. So it appears the state of Oklahoma procured the facility for the purpose of a FEMA refugee camp.



reply posted on 6-9-2005 @ 05:55 AM by TheShroudOfMemphis
Very intesting, these could be very rare photos once these places go into action.

I've often said that there doesn't need to be 'barbedwired camps' everywhere, there doesn't need to be 'train cars' everywhere for a 'camp' to be created because there is such a thing as 'commandeering'.

Why would they spend millions (probable billions the way money flows in this admin) to maintain a block of cement or a razorwired area that needs maintainance and staff for many years until it's use, which may not ever happen, when they can simply take what they need, when they need it?

Maybe the 'razor wire fences' will go up after the camp is filled and communications are cut? It's pretty easy to assemble a fence and gaurd boundry. They wouldn't need 'mines', they'd have ground sensors and helicopters with imaging that will spot any 'run aways' no matter how well they hide or how dark the night is, ever seen 'Cops'?. They collect them and bring them back or take them to 'another camp'.

This is exactly how you begin a camp system. Like i said before the Hurricane, it will be used as a Martial Law exercise, promoted as a good thing and for safety but will be equally establishing precedents which sacrifice more 'liberties & freedoms' and put the population even more under the governments thumb. This is 9/11 phaze two: Tell them it's for their good because the alternative could be disaster.

They allowed the situation to develop by delaying response so they could watch the public demand the military's involvement. They promoted 'looting' to ingrain the idea that in these situations, law enforcement is your best ally. They even tried to suggest no one could of seen it coming!

This event will prove invaluable to the maestro's.
I predict next we'll hear of bio-databasing proceedures taking place in refugee camps, just like what happened in Fallujah as those people returned to what was left of their homes.

There's more to come of this live drill.


reply posted on 6-9-2005 @ 06:49 AM by Valhall
Originally posted by justyc

what will be the consequences of a large amount of desperate, depressed and displaced people being so cut off from normal life (ie tvs, computers, phones, jobs, shopping, freely being abe to come & go etc) staying in one of these camps for 5 months? what are they going to be doing in this camp every single day - sit around the camp fire and sing kumbaya?


Some cabins will have TV's. Ours, for instance, does not. According to the mentality of FEMA - this should most likely cause a riot.

We'll work to get our cabin a TV and VCR - I know we have enough VCR movies to last them a while.



there are toys & family cabins, but who is going to be teaching the children?


EXTREMELY good point. If this is handled right (and I'm over-sensationalizing ), these children should be enrolled in the Davis school system by the end of the week, and bussed out and in every day. This will be a measure of how "detained" these people are. If they are going to be there for 5 months, and seeing as the school year just started about 10 days ago - this would allow these children a full semester at least.


will they be able to use the phones set up for the 'hosts' use to stay in touch with their families or will they be denied contact with the outside world?


Don't know. Gotta sawbuck on "no". There is a bank of pay phones at Falls Creek. Guess that's what the "sum of money" is for.


finally, would you be willing to sneak up in a 'through the woods' way to find a way to view the camp if you are denied access once the people are in there (& as your church no longer owns its cabin you will not be able to use 'checking the cabin' as an excuse)


Springer and I are going to stay in close contact with our church's preacher. At this point, I'm up for anything if this turns out to be the way the "hosts" were describing.

I lived 8 years of my life in that are...that's why I know how High Road got it's name . And I know that area pretty darned good.




[edit on 9-6-2005 by Valhall]


reply posted on 6-9-2005 @ 06:49 AM by thematrix
Not to mention that in case these were actual places to detain prisoners that lost their prison, the "hosts" would in no way be civilians and stay in the cabins.

FEMA not accepting certain things to be donated(which in perspective with them also refusing fuel, water and food in ON) is just a dumbass decision. They should just accept everything and ship of what they can't use to an international sharity or something, they are plain wasting time for themselves and the people that are contributing with this.

Then, some people here have objections with Valhall calling this a detention/detainment camp.
The people are said not to be allowed to leave the camp for any reason for at least 5 months.
What is not being allowed to leave a location in the middle of nowhere for 5 months called then if it isn't detention or detainment?

Valhall, I strongly agree that this is something you should go public with. Just give your account of what you've seen and sell the pictures to the press (yes I say sell the pictures, so that the money you get from it can be turned to charity, like that the press at least does something decent instead of just scavenge the misery of others for top stories).

And the press can choose to publish the story in whatever interpretation they want. You can use it as a test to see if they twist and turn what you've seen and heard and testify to them, to whatever FEMA and the goverment wants to be heard by the public or if they relay your story the way you gave it to them.

Your own and original published story is here on ATS, protected by the ATS content copyrights.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



San Onofre Ready To Blow Anytime
  Posted 8 days ago with 4 member flags
Radiation Network 2/2/12 website image not loading
  Posted 8 days ago with 0 member flags