posted on Sep, 14 2005 @ 04:20 AM
There are a lot of different ways to put this puzzle together. Here I take the known facts( pieces) we have and SPECULATE about how they might
logically fit together.
There were THREE real justifications the authorities could have employed to carry out forced relocation and imprisonment(If that is what they indeed
And, It seems to me every thing was in place to achieve at least one of the three. To the point that JUST DAYS BEFORE KATRINA HIT A NEW LAW WAS
PASSED MAKING "LOOTING" DURING A STATE OF EMERGENCY A THREE YEAR, NO PAROLE OFFENSE.
Then SOMEBODY (ACTUALLY, EVERYBODY AT EVERY LEVEL OF AUTHORITY) CONCIOUSLY CHOSE NOT TO EVACUATE THE POOREST (ALMOST ENTIRELY BLACK) SEGMENT OF THE
POPULATION, leaving the city for all practical purposes populated with nobody except "society's burdensome members". The poor, the illiterate,
the retarded, the blind, the elderly, the sick, the imprisoned, the criminals not imprisoned, and all their even further dependant babies and
The 1987 Miami Hearald article exposed documented proof of a Federal plan back then to forcibly relocate 21 million "negros" if they could be
accused of "rebellion". So such an idea is not one our leaders have never considered employing. It is NOT UNTHINKABLE (except to American
citizens) to our government.
The justification of "disease" is more of a problematical tar baby to employ. Instead of the normal public reaction to lock away and forget
lawbreakers, "diseased" becomes "poor sick" and DRAWS public attention and concern for the "innocent, ill" people.Just the kind of attention to
the camps that the authorities would not want.
UNLESS the "diseased" are attributed to having something communicable, or something NEW, a health THREAT to the rest of the population, but if that
story is used, AGAIN, it would DRAW the public's attention to the camps, out of fear that these "infected" "carriers" might somehow escape or
spread their alleged dire malady to the rest of us.
So all they had to do was not maintain the levees, let New Orleans continue to sink and wait for the INEVITABLE DISASTER their experts had advised
them, AND THEY ABSOLUTELY KNEW awaited New Orleans. Then, the objective, "Rebellion and/or Looting" were the inevitable product of rounding up the
undesirables and penning them up without food and water for nearly a week.
Rebellion could be falsely attributed by merely attributing EVERY sound of a gunshot to an attack on authorities. (And, more sounds of gunshots COULD
be arranged if what occurred under the deliberately dire circumstance seemed insufficient to justify further witholding aid to the people) We did
personally watch a live news coverage where police fearfully barricaded in their station ATTRIBUTED and ASSUMED every gunshot they merely HEARD to be
an "attack on us". Their response?
Fire blindly into the dark towards the welfare housing where they were sure the shot was fired. They had no idea what man woman or child THEY may
have shot in the darkness or even that the shot was not someone defending their home, they just ASSUMED all gunshots they heard to be attacks on
police. God help anyone shooting a water moccasin threatening them. I concede some police who tried to stop the frenzy their elected leaders had
generated in the city risk their life doing so and some WERE killed. Others recognizing they and the poor were "set up', and the impossible
circumstance that THEY TOO were put in by their leaders, more wisely stepped back and simply tried to keep anyone from getting hurt during the
Unfortunately for the powers that be who wanted to remake New Orleans into a Southern version of RENO, without the "undesirable element" and without
the business expense of buying them out and relocating them. Let the Feds do that at taxpayer expense. The developers then inherit and bulldoze the
prime development real estate once occupied by New Orleans impoverished, and reap a enormous return on a now much less expensive investment venture.
All the while demanding the taxpayers construct new dikes for the wealthier classes to occupy the new rebuilt city, dikes comparable to the
engineering used in DUTCH sea walls .
But they waited too many years. In came the internet, too many reporters. too many voices and witnesses, Digital cameras, camera phones, instant
messaging, bloggers, too hard to manage public opinion and perception. In come people like valhall throwing light and questions on preparations that
were NOT meant to be examined closely. People gathering evidence about relief and rescue turned away, supplies and fuel seized, Communications
equipment DELIBERATELY delayed by forcing it to come by bus instead of plane starting its trip from California on the third day after the "cane"
Sound like a Fantastic conspiracy theory? Possibly. But a plausible one. It remains to be seen if a probable one. When public opinion did NOT
support the government severly hammering down a vicious "rebellion"(as they thought they would), but instead started probing the WHY's of all this
strange, unusual government OBSTRUCTION of relief to disaster victims, the powers that be suddenly woke up to the realization that the "jig was
up", the plan only partially successful and the prime task left to COVER THE ASSES OF THE CULPABLE at the top and behind the curtain, pulling all the
strings on the whole event. The "mission", Falls Creek and others like it were jettisoned and the new spin and PR focus to make the whole thing
appear to be a simple confusion of overlapping authorities, mismanagement and SNAFU primarily at the lowest level possible starting with blaming the
victim and on to targeting the incompetant boob selected and installed (Head of FEMA) to take the fall if inquiry got too heated.
Something to mull over, anyway. Could turn out like the rash of "suicides" we see happening to micro biologists. Suicide, lotta that going
around, especially among government people who know too much, must be contagious, eh?