Reports have surfaced that after just 4 days black New Owens reverted back to the cannibalism that was rampant in pre-colonial Africa. Type
“cannibalism New-Owens” on Google and you’ll see what I mean.
www.worldnetdaily.com...
www.omgn.com...
However so far there seems to be only one original source; that is a “civil rights activist” by the sir name of Robinsons. And of course he’s
holding people of white ethnic origin responsible by unashamedly accusing them of “neglecting African Americans”. May we be grateful to people
like him for not using politics to take advantage of a natural disaster (possibly aided by global warming).
Which brings me to my point: Is hurricane Katrina raciest? Hurricane Katrina struck an area where about two thirds of the population are black.
Furthermore many of the black people living in New Owens where disproportionately poor to the white population owing firstly to the failure of global
communism and secondly to the lack of family wealth (caused in part by the legacy of racial discrimination).
Furthermore; only when the majority of “black-exploiting whites” had evacuated New Owens (enabled in part by their disproportionately high wealth)
did the hurricane strike the area with its full force. So come on! Is this a white supremacist hurricane or what?
But seriously what should we do about the Robinsons in this world who use natural disasters, accusations of cannibalism (so far without evidence) and
in normal times everything and anything in the book to steer up hatred against white people, and therefore cause the opposite as well?
If Robinson was a Nazi the chances are the media would ignore him; so by accusing his own people of cannibalism and then blaming it on whites (so far
without apparent evidence on both counts) he has surely been more effective at playing politics with race than any born again Hitler?
If so, do the Robinsons of this world have a moral right to incite racial hatred? (Even if it’s just against white people?).
In other words could people like him be held to account for the social tension and trouble they cause? In fact can they be in today’s “political
correct society”?
Certainly in Britain we have a law against “incitement to racial hatred”. Personally I think this goes way too far, but is that what you think is
needed? Because surely we don’t want the Robinson’s of this world or their consequences any more than we need them? And at a time when so many
people are going to return home with next to nothing is it really wise to tolerate people who make such remarks encase they succeed in turning
desperate peoples grief to anger?
Are there any alternatives presides legislation to combat the current state of affairs you know of? Or could even recommend? Or else is the only way
forward to follow the British government by legislating against freedom of speech in order to legislate against racism (“incitement to cause racial
hatred”)?