“Black’s Turn Cannibal!” And Is Katrina a Racist Hurricane?, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 5-9-2005 @ 02:04 PM by Liberal1984
Reports have surfaced that after just 4 days black New Owens reverted back to the cannibalism that was rampant in pre-colonial Africa. Type “cannibalism New-Owens” on Google and you’ll see what I mean.
www.worldnetdaily.com...
www.omgn.com...
However so far there seems to be only one original source; that is a “civil rights activist” by the sir name of Robinsons. And of course he’s holding people of white ethnic origin responsible by unashamedly accusing them of “neglecting African Americans”. May we be grateful to people like him for not using politics to take advantage of a natural disaster (possibly aided by global warming).

Which brings me to my point: Is hurricane Katrina raciest? Hurricane Katrina struck an area where about two thirds of the population are black. Furthermore many of the black people living in New Owens where disproportionately poor to the white population owing firstly to the failure of global communism and secondly to the lack of family wealth (caused in part by the legacy of racial discrimination).
Furthermore; only when the majority of “black-exploiting whites” had evacuated New Owens (enabled in part by their disproportionately high wealth) did the hurricane strike the area with its full force. So come on! Is this a white supremacist hurricane or what?

But seriously what should we do about the Robinsons in this world who use natural disasters, accusations of cannibalism (so far without evidence) and in normal times everything and anything in the book to steer up hatred against white people, and therefore cause the opposite as well?

If Robinson was a Nazi the chances are the media would ignore him; so by accusing his own people of cannibalism and then blaming it on whites (so far without apparent evidence on both counts) he has surely been more effective at playing politics with race than any born again Hitler?

If so, do the Robinsons of this world have a moral right to incite racial hatred? (Even if it’s just against white people?).
In other words could people like him be held to account for the social tension and trouble they cause? In fact can they be in today’s “political correct society”?
Certainly in Britain we have a law against “incitement to racial hatred”. Personally I think this goes way too far, but is that what you think is needed? Because surely we don’t want the Robinson’s of this world or their consequences any more than we need them? And at a time when so many people are going to return home with next to nothing is it really wise to tolerate people who make such remarks encase they succeed in turning desperate peoples grief to anger?
Are there any alternatives presides legislation to combat the current state of affairs you know of? Or could even recommend? Or else is the only way forward to follow the British government by legislating against freedom of speech in order to legislate against racism (“incitement to cause racial hatred”)?


reply posted on 11-9-2005 @ 07:44 PM by Liberal1984
Thanks everybody for the interesting responses. I haven’t heard much more about cannibalism so I suppose the so called civil rights activist Robinson really was trying to promote his own fame at the expense of his own people.
Stumason sorry about mentioning "the failure of global communism for the lack of family wealth in the black population". I was half joking and only mentioned it because communism would make "everybody equal" (well financially anyway depending on what version).
Yes you are totally right that the lack of family wealth in the black population is mostly due to past and ongoing discrimination which is why I mentioned it immediately afterwards.

WARNING A POSSIBLY OFFENSIVE OPINION AND LINK
But if like most people you think all races are COMPLETELY equal i think you are wrong. I don't agree with racial discrimination because i think it is by a too blunt an instrument to justify discrimination. There's better ways (criminal records ect). But personally I am racist when it comes to thinking that on AVERAGE some races outperform others in certain areas at least. There are 3 reasons: diet (famine can't be good for brain development), culture (a repetitive lifestyle or one of living with view people can't be good for brain development ether) and genetic. Do you really that the challenges faced by our ancestors leaving Africa, and the different societies and cultures we humans live in have had nil on human genetics? Or that society alone has not caused a form of selective breeding to take place through the generations?
Well maybe your right but I suggest you take a look at the below link. There's no swastika’s (not that I can see) and I don't think the sites run by skin heads. Just academics speaking the findings of their research.

www.mugu.com...

If I believed in racial discrimination I would not be afraid to say it on here (after my warnings at least). But I don't for the reason said: It’s too blunt an instrument. But nether do I believe all races are equal, and no I don't think whites are the smartest race in the world. Personally I understand it to be the Chinese and Indians to be above us in the IQ score (and I’m European English by the way).
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



No Russians, but exercises take place today in Denver & DIA
  Posted 9 days ago with 4 member flags