It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In the great scheme of things however, Is the position that influential? Im asking here because SC internal matters is a weak spon im my grasp of history. Is it not more of a cerimonial position? I do not see the CJ being able to bully anybody with a lifetime appointment to vote his way anyhow.
Stand aside ya'll this is how a cowboy operates. Nominating some one to lead the Supreme Court before he is even on it! This is a slap in the face to the rest of the Supreme Court who have been serving for years. Even Rehnquist served on the Supreme Court as a Justice for 14 years before becoming Chief Justice.
... can you explain to me how many of those chief justices were appointed without the consent of the legislative branch?
Theres denying ignorance and there is being arrogant.
And if you want to be pedantic Y'ALL, your link is dead
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
Quit being a crybaby, subz. If someone starts pontificating with the sole reason of slamming the administration of the United States, he can be expected to be called on it -- especially if he doesn't know what he's talking about.
And if you want to be pedantic Y'ALL, your link is dead
So is Rehnquist, which is why Roberts will be the next Chief Justice.
[edit on 5-9-2005 by Off_The_Street]
I would have love to see Thomas in the seat for chief, but as everything in this nation and with the present administration, things tend to be a littler bit on the favoritism side.
And Thomas is not the right color.
Now Mr. Roberts is just the poppet of the religious movement in America and now they are going to get their wish to take over the Supreme court with him as chief.
...I even prefer Gonzales if he was nominated.
Originally posted by marg6043
And Thomas is not the right color.
I agree this man is not Justice material I even prefer Gonzales if he was nominated.
Originally posted by subz
Stand aside ya'll this is how a cowboy operates. Nominating some one to lead the Supreme Court before he is even on it!
This is a slap in the face to the rest of the Supreme Court who have been serving for years. Even Rehnquist served on the Supreme Court as a Justice for 14 years before becoming Chief Justice.
Why is Bush rushing to get his own man as Chief Justice right now? Astounding
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
Of the sixteen Chiefs of the Supreme Court, 11, or over two-thirds, first came to the Supreme Court as Chief Justice, and only five were promoted from Associate Justice. What Bush is doing is the rule, not the exception.
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
What makes you think they weren't approved of by the Senate?
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
Quit being a crybaby, subz. If someone starts pontificating with the sole reason of slamming the administration of the United States, he can be expected to be called on it -- especially if he doesn't know what he's talking about.