It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by lost_shaman
Well... it seems like an average pic of a something or other , but since you don't know who took it or where they took it , it simply has to go in the interesting but unverifiable pile.
Originally posted by Whompa1
I know the general area it was taken in. I would say its more then your "average" pic
Originally posted by lost_shaman
Right! Something is in the picture.
But you can't know anything about it unless you can talk to the photographer.
And since that isn't possible why not make a better case with the better cases?
If you taut this case as " being the real thing " and you have no photographer or real case to make , how will that look to the people exploring the field for the first time ?
Originally posted by lost_shaman
It can matter to you as much as you want it to, but when there are thousands of reports worldwide and they have a heck of a lot more than just an ATS member that knows the general area to back them up.
So why waste your time on an anonymous photo?
You might find the photographer one day , and have him tell you " Oh! Jeez! That was a fly in the photo that wouldn't leave me alone!"
So why not just make the case your making with the thousands of better more verifiable reports , rather than waste time on something that is anonymous?
Originally posted by sinta_ilfirin
I don't know if I would be considered an expert; but I am an avid amature/ semi professional photographer. I have had some odd jobs shooting photos for people. I have worked at a photo lab when I was younger for approximatley 5 to 6 years, and I have taken photography classes before.
To me it looks like a speck of dust/dirt on the lens. Maybe even inside the lens itself. The reason for it being fuzzy around the edges would be simply the fact that it is out of the lenses focal length. Kind of like the human eye when an object gets to close to the eye it blurs out. Other posible scenarios could be a flaw in the emoltion of the negative, or a possible development flaw. I would have to look at the real print and negative to tell for sure. If it was a digital camera then I would definitley say that it came from the lens.
That is just what I see anyway....
Originally posted by Whompa1
I never once stood on the roof tops shouting "This picture shows beyond the shadow of a doubt that aliens are real." I'm sorry maybe I misunderstood the whole point of this forum and the point of search for UFO's. Not every photo is gonna come out with a well defined craft. 9 out of 10 photos are like mine. Pictures of images that could be something or nothing at all.
Originally posted by lost_shaman
Originally posted by Whompa1
I never once stood on the roof tops shouting "This picture shows beyond the shadow of a doubt that aliens are real." I'm sorry maybe I misunderstood the whole point of this forum and the point of search for UFO's. Not every photo is gonna come out with a well defined craft. 9 out of 10 photos are like mine. Pictures of images that could be something or nothing at all.
That's true , but I never claimed that you made any claims , I simply stated their are better photos than the one you presented. You admitted that you had only come across the photo , and did not even know who took it .
Did you not?
So why should you be so defensive , over nothing? ( A pic you have admitted that you didn't take )
Since you didn't take the photo why did you say " 9 out of 10 photos are like mine."
Originally posted by Inno887
Nice photos , were they taken recently
Originally posted by lost_shaman
My only mission is to make the case for the ETH.
Originally posted by Krpano
Sry to say but the pic has so low details that its almost impossible to get anything out of it, without count the object is really far/small.
As lost_shaman said..it be great to have the photographer to give us more details.
The original pic(the one without the cropped area) already seems to be zoomed...or it looks like it was taken by a webcam.
I vote for a ballon or an artifact on the lens as was said.