It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by LordBucket
That's the Library of Congress website. Notice the ".gov" address? Go there, click on "enter bill number" and do a search for bill# S 517
You may look at this as a game of chess, but it is hardly that is it? The chess board and all of its product is man made, there is nothing manmade about earth, its volcanic or temperate activity. Lesson one therefore is: do not send any hand carved pawn, knight, bishop, queen or king into battle with that which has the sole ability to create the wood, ivory, marble or crystal from which you carve your defense.
Originally posted by kilendrialDo you play chess?...I would gladly sacrifice a bishop for a rook.
You say that as though you you know for a fact. The NWO is speculation, and can only be speculation until individuals can unequivocally provide proof that after all these centuries that such an entity supposedly existed, provides proof that it does in fact exist. The world changes, constantly at that! Not because there is any NWO but because of mans'ever increasing knowledge and his need to advance. Were such a term as New World Order invented 7,000 years ago, the first government ever to be instituted would still be awaiting its day of triumph.
All in all, any possible NWO would require large scale panic to have the legal ability and support to take certain security protocols to the level in which they are needed for the plan to work. It is equivalent to trade losing your army or a portion of it for being able to checkmating the king.
5 million dollars may seem trite to you, in which case, why not just reject every penny of aid, cash or assistance offered to you? It would not matter if that aid was one penny, it is aid, and rather than denegrate it, you should be thankful that the rest of the world is reaching out. A true enemy offers you nothing!
China proposed 5 million in aid and Russia offered to help with rescue efforts. I don't think that will mitigate much destruction and thus would not be to negative in the view of an enemy or attacker.
Why because you say so? they cannot be compelled to do anything. There will be no retribution for them were they to do nothing! It seems you are one of those individuals who would scream that in its hour of need the US gets no assistance from other countries, and yet you go out of your way here to show just how ungrateful you are for what they do offer.
I have seen individual proposals from 26 entities and countries including Kuwait, Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, France, Spain, England etc. etc. etc. etc.. It would be out of place and look bad for these well known countries to do nothing.
In fact I do not play it at all, I hated the game from the very day my father, a grand-master showed me how to play same. If you insist on comparing life to a chess board then you had better understand that a new champion will always arise.
You obviously don't play much chess.
Why theirs of course. Are you sure you play chess? The issue here is not defeating the pawn but defeating the king, and I would have expected the intuitive to understand that by wiping out the barrier would then ultimately lead to the erosion and eventual destruction of that which it sheltered.
Further, it would be a mistake of the highest degree for the US government to wipe out the gulf coast barrier and leave the rest vulnerable to earth's natural disasters.
Mistake according to whose goals?
You are being quite naive here, in that you would expect creating weather conditions would be the same as creating a bomb or some such thing in some mountain edifice. This is after all weather out in the open that would be manipulated where given the technology today, any country that may have the abilty to alter same would also have the ability to understand when it is being manipulated. It is very safe to say that only few countries could be named as technologically advanced enough to hold such capability and it does not take a rocket scientist to understand that given your own sentiment, one need not know for certain which of these potential enemies spawned such a disaster in order to retaliate against one or all--just as a show of defiance.
If you create a hurricane to attack someone who can also create a hurricane, there may be no retaliation if the attack is not detected. All the people have to do is be sure that it can't be detected not that they are the only ones with the technology.
What you think and what may in fact be true are two different things. If your thinking was factual, then tectonic activity could be controlled. It lacks a great deal of insight to suggest that unleashing devastating tectonic activity could be done in such a fashion that the other party would not retaliate and that the after-effects such as the wave would not reach the coastal areas of country and or allies of the attacking country.
if it is possible to weaponize mother nature, it must also be presumed that weather and tectonic activity can be steered, which is highly doubtful.
A small earthquake happens after ever rocket launch. I think seismic activity could be controlled/started with tunneling equipment and nuclear weapons. If you want to attack X city, tunnel to X metters down and detonate a nuke adjusting number of nukes and depth to maximize damage and detection.
Your definition of nature and mine are obviously different.
Also, we have undoubtedly weaponized nature. Just look at bombs, tanks, airplanes, satellites and their mechanial workings as those things all are based on natural workings. How would weapons not be?
In other words, you think they are stupid enough to not understand that if they shift one plate, the rest of the the earth is unaffected. I see!
Politicians already play russion roulette with 'her'(why not him?). Every chemical that is invented and mass-produced on a grand scale may have inadverdant and surprising results on the ecosystem and possibly one chemical in low quantity could wipe out all life(unlikely). I doubt seismic tampering will destory much except it might cause earthquakes which happen anyway. Have you ever heard of the Cold War? That was much more risky than seismic tampering.
Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth's atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere.
A method and apparatus for altering at least one selected region which normally exists above the earth's surface. The region is excited by electron cyclotron resonance heating to thereby increase its charged particle density. In one embodiment, circularly polarized electromagnetic radiation is transmitted upward in a direction substantially parallel to and along a field line which extends through the region of plasma to be altered. The radiation is transmitted at a frequency which excites electron cyclotron resonance to heat and accelerate the charged particles. This increase in energy can cause ionization of neutral particles which are then absorbed as part of the region thereby increasing the charged particle density of the region.
Early in July of this year, the leading weather predictor of Hurricanes in the US predicted this storm. He showed at the time that this 'storm' would not follow established tracks, would grow in an 'unexplained way' and cause massive devistation when it made landfall.
Originally posted by Icarus Rising
The fact that weather modification has made it into the public domain in the form of a Senate bill says to me that the technology has already been developed and is in play to a signigicant extent in the MIC.
I'm assuming we all know the public is the last to learn of scientific advances, after the powers that be have gleaned their needs from it, watered it down, and made it appear harmless, even of benefit to society.
Originally posted by Zero_057
A couple links to check out on the control of weather by man, whether or not Katrina was man-made or possibly manipulated by man, the whole scenario is for sure something to be researched and if not possible then it should be not even food for thought, but can anyone say for certain?
Originally posted by Zero_057
A couple links to check out on the control of weather by man