It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Muaddib
Originally posted by magnito_student
Anyone that steps up to the line and defends this administration at this point says one thing about their psyche: "They will never wake up from the lie no matter what and will follow this runaway locomotive called the New World Order off the cliif into the abyss"
Please Neo...wake us up...we seem to need your enlightenment to wake to what you call the real world.
Do you have a blue pill?....or is it the red one?....
Yeah, I think we can see whose "psyche" is out of the loop here...
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
Of course, they never existed, and the crazies are strangely quiet about the fact that if there actually were such things, they’d be used now, but given the depths of human silliness, within a week or so, they will start to come up with a theory about why these non-existent facilities were deliberately withheld.
Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.
Active-duty soldiers would not be involved in law enforcement, Inge said, but would provide a variety of security and humanitarian assistance.
except in such cases and under such circumstances as such employment of said force may be expressly authorized by the Constitution or by act of Congress
(c) The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities,...
(3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.
You have voted Sugarlump for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have two more votes this month.
Originally posted by bodebliss
Partial to the Jar heads ,huh, Marg?
Well I was an Airborne Ranger stationed w/ the 82nd airborne(4yrs) and they've been called up as well, "All The Way, Sir"
Originally posted by The Vagabond
Since the title of this article remains miraculously unchanged,
Originally posted by Indy
You may disagree with my post but it is right on topic. And it has to do with the need to send in military because of the lack of National Guard members. And the reason there is a lack is because our president has sent them overseas to fight this nonsense war.
Originally posted by Indy
Active military pour into New Orleans because the National Guard is extremely thin. And why is it extremely thin? Because they are in Iraq. Feel free to insert your own reason why they are in Iraq. I stated my OPINION as the message at the top of the page encourages. There was nothing like "right wing this" or "liberal that".
The Iraqi insurgency is in its last throes. The economy is booming. Anybody who leaks a CIA agent's identity will be fired. Add another piece of White House rhetoric that doesn't match the public's view of reality: Help is on the way, Gulf Coast.
As New Orleans descended into anarchy, US President George W. Bush and his emergency-response team congratulated each other on Friday for jobs well done and spoke of water, food and troops pouring into the ravaged city. Television pictures told a different story.
"What it reminded me of the other day is `Baghdad Bob' saying there are no Americans at the airport," said Rich Galen, a Republican consultant in Washington.