It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
This angers me so much, it’s our money we can do with it whatever we want.
The problem in Africa or the rest of the world is not my fault, and I should pay for it because it’s the right thing to do??? Give me a freaking break! If we want to sped more on our DoD bugged so what? Mind your business!
NO, Is my tax payer money not yours and I want accountability for it.
As a rich nation we have a moral right to fight hunger and famine, but we have not right to instigate wars in other countries.
This angers me so much, it’s our money we can do with it whatever we want.
"I don't think our troops ought to be used for what's called nation-building," said Bush during the campaign. "We're not into nation-building," he said last September.
Unfortunately, even we don't all agree on how it's being spent. this isn't about what we want, it's about what the government decides.
Originally posted by Souljah
Hmmm...
Are you seriously Asking me that?
How about increasing Education, Health, Social Services and all other areas which don't get enough Money at all?
By looking at this Pie Charts it's much too OBVIOUS who is the No.1 Military Empire on this Planet and where the Billions of Dollars go, when this Money should go to the people who really need it.
Or do we need more Tanks? More Aircraft? More Warships? More Nuclear Bombs? More Weapons to blow ourselves UP?
Yes - Apparently YOU PEOPLE need more of that.
So Children in Africa will get their first gun when they are 12 and start killing people.
Yes, that's what we need.
[edit on 31/8/05 by Souljah]
One thing to remember we elect the government, "the government is for the people and by the people."
Carlyle group = Bush family
Haliburtion = Cheney
Bush + Cheney = elected officials.
Originally posted by marg6043
Originally posted by WestPoint23
This angers me so much, it’s our money we can do with it whatever we want.
NO, Is my tax payer money not yours and I want accountability for it.
The problem in Africa or the rest of the world is not my fault, and I should pay for it because it’s the right thing to do??? Give me a freaking break! If we want to sped more on our DoD bugged so what? Mind your business!
As a rich nation we have a moral right to fight hunger and famine, but we have not right to instigate wars in other countries.
Is nothing wrong with making our military the best in the world, but the problem is the ones that "ARE" benefiting from The increased in the "Military budget" the "Carlyle" group and "Haliburton" from the war in Iraq.
That where the problem is private corporations and firms are getting the profits from all the government doings because the relationship with one another.
Its called dirty politics.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
One thing to remember we elect the government, "the government is for the people and by the people."
I know, we elect the government and after we elect them they do what they think is best for the people, disagree? Vote.
Also all this large corporation stuff is over exaggerated. Find me a poor guy or a poor company (whatever that is) that can rebuild Iraq for us and I would gladly be in favor of them.
do you see anything suspicious that the 2 top heads of this nation have close ties to the 2 major contracted companies in iraq? not looking for a long answer, just a simple yes or no with a short explanation would do.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
In short no, those companies would still be there even if another administration was in office. Why? Because they have the resources and experience for the job, whether you like who they are associated with is another matter.
Originally posted by Conspicuouz
Originally posted by WestPoint23
In short no, those companies would still be there even if another administration was in office. Why? Because they have the resources and experience for the job, whether you like who they are associated with is another matter.
agreed. i believe they'll be doing just fine as a company without having the 2 major political officers because. but would they have been able to get such non-bidding deals without their influence? isn't it in the best interest of an administration to find the best cost-efficient solution and at least get some bids from other companies for such huge contracts?
but would they have been able to get such non-bidding deals without their influence? isn't it in the best interest of an administration to find the best cost-efficient solution and at least get some bids from other companies for such huge contracts?
but alas.........have they found that girl in aurba yet?
Originally posted by marg6043
Here is a nice link to inside information of Cheney dealings with haliburton.
Occurs you can read it or discarted as just more lies against our nice Mr. Cheney and Haliburton.
www.halliburtonwatch.org...
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Probably not, and I also don’t agree with their decision of a non-bidding deal.