It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sardion2000
If a foreign head of state you don't like gets threatend by one of America's most popular televangilists it's akin to calling for the assasination of a serial killer, if a head of state or a mulluh or something like that calls for the assasination of Bush or Cheney then they are Terrorists. I see your thinking quite clearly now and hopefully everyone else who's in doubt will too.
Al-bab.com
Over Christmas 1998, from December 24 to 26, SOS held its fourth Islamic Camp at Finsbury Park Mosque in north London. The list of activities included "military training for brothers". A picture of a hand grenade appeared on the publicity material. Admission was £20, with reduced prices for children and families.
pbs.org
It seems though people are very frightened of you, because you're speaking as if those people who you say have justified grievances have done nothing but spill the blood of innocents -- the Nairobi and Dar-es-Salaam bombings, the Luxor massacre, the World Trade Center attacks and the Pentagon attack. This has all resulted in many people, clerks, secretaries, ordinary civilian workers, Muslims among them.
Well, you got to get your terms right as well. A civilian term doesn't exist in Islam. What exists in Islam and what matters in Islam, a harming body or harmless body; whoever is not harming, he's protected. ...
The idea of civilians not being a clearly defined group in Islam is very worrisome, too.
Is very worry, yes. Because you can have a woman, for example, who actually wearing a miniskirt and she's not military, but she's actually confiscating people's money and the computer and she's working as a spy. You can never call her a civilian. ...
So it's a form of collateral damage?
It's basically, "You pick on us, and we retaliate back." This is exactly what the message was given. I told you in Nairobi and Dar-es-Salaam was never an action. It was only a reaction for the handing over and snatching of people who are minding their own business and living in a country like Albania peacefully. They have families. You made the children orphans. And you have undermined their reputation, their struggled and their religion.
So, you know, if you want to see the real analogy, it's to tell your people the whole picture. Don't blame the nail who goes through the wall. First see what hammers the nail.
National Review online
January 5, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez's former personal pilot dropped a bombshell that has been ignored by just about every major U.S. news organization: The Venezuelan president, according to the pilot, gave al Qaeda a substantial sum of money following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
Venezuelan Air Force Major Juan Diaz Castillo, who is now seeking political asylum in the United States and says his "life and liberty are in danger in Venezuela," says Chavez chose him to conduct the transfer because he trusted him as a close personal assistant. But Díaz, disgusted with Chavez's regime, resigned his post on October 25 — and fled following a December 16 attempt on his life.
At a Miami press conference this past Sunday, Diaz said that shortly following the September 11 terrorist attacks, Chavez commissioned him "to organize, coordinate, and execute a covert operation consisting of delivering financial resources, specifically $1 million, to [Afghanistan's] Taliban government, in order for them to assist the al-Qaeda terrorist organization," while, "making it appear as if humanitarian aid were being extended to the Afghan people."
The first attempt to transfer the money fell through, but in late September 2001 Venezuelan Vice President Diosdado Cabello decided to funnel the money through Venezuela's ambassador in India, one Walter Marquez. The Taliban received the money and publicly acknowledged receipt of $100,000 in "humanitarian aid." "The rest went straight to al Qaeda," claims Díaz Castillo. "That is, $900,000."
National Review
Diaz Castillo's testimony alone should not be taken at face value — but his statements are consistent with other defectors' testimony and Chavez's public behavior.
*General Marcos Ferreira, who resigned as director of Venezuela's border-control service, recently told Insight magazine that Cuba's General Intelligence Directorate (Spanish initials: DGI) has practically taken over Venezuela's ominously named Directorate for Intelligence, Security, and Prevention (DISIP), and that Interior Minister Ramon Rodriguez Chacin pressured him to cover up the identities of terrorists — many from the Middle East — passing through Venezuela and to deceive U.S. terrorism investigators. "I quit my job when I got tired of doing dirty work for Chavez with the Cubans looking over my shoulder," he said.
*General Nestor Gonzalez Gonzalez, another military dissident, says Chavez has routed weapons and supplies from Cuba through Venezuela to Marxist guerrillas in Colombia. Gonzalez was with Diaz Castillo on December 16 during the failed attempt on Diaz's life. Militares Democraticos, a military dissident coalition, claims that Gonzalez was also targeted and that Chavez's DISIP was behind the attempt.
*In 2001, Chavez paid state visits to — and signed "cooperation agreements" with — Libya, Iraq, and Iran.
Originally posted by cmaracing
when Robertson calls on the death of judges and doctors is that illegal
Originally posted by cmaracing
The USA has taken into custody people for what has been said, Robertson is against abortion and is in favor of the death penalty. But what I don’t hear is outrage for a minister that wants death instead of tolerance of all
Originally posted by junglejake
I use metaphors and examples when I describe things.
Originally posted by junglejake
Thank you, though, for your example. I didn't know about him, and as a result did a little research. Perhaps I should contact the British government. Abu Hamza Al-Masri is not as innocent as you have been led to believe.
Originally posted by junglejake
First, he sends funds to fundamentalist Muslim terror organizations across the world.
Originally posted by junglejake
In December of 1998, his website published a brochure announcing an "Islamic camp". The brochure said that the camp offered "military training for brothers, self-development skills, martial arts, map reading, etc.” That sounds like a terrorist training camp to me, but that’s not all he’s done.
Originally posted by junglejake
The Italian daily La Repubblica reported that the Italian secret service (S.I.S.D.E.) uncovered a plot to attack Bush during the G-8 summit in Genoa. The S.I.S.D.E. report connects him in a meeting held on June 29, 2001 with Abu Doha, an Al’Queda member recently arrested in London, as well.
Originally posted by junglejake
He also appeared on Al’Jazeera to correct a misunderstanding of a quote he had made in regards to Yemen. “The word I used was not ‘foreigners.’ Some of the foreigners there [in Yemen] are Muslims. I speak of infidels. Infidels are innocent according to Islamic norms [if]: They become Muslims, or they pay jizya, or they enter into an agreement that guarantees their safety in a country that implements the Shari’a. Otherwise, their blood and wealth are not to be protected.” He also incited his listeners to attack a group of Russian journalists covering the incidents in Chechnya.
Originally posted by junglejake
The Yemeni government claims that in October of 1998, he was involved in an attempt to assassinate Yemeni president Ali Abdallah Ssleh.
Originally posted by junglejake
This man is suspected of a lot more than propaganda or expressing his opinion. He has his fingers in pies that he shouldn’t, allegedly. That is why the US wants him.
Originally posted by looking4truth
Subz, now you're just embarrassing yourself.
Originally posted by looking4truth
Abu Hamza? Leader of the group "supporters of shar'ia" or SOS, that Abu Hamza right? Really, an innocent man imprisoned for speaking out right?
Originally posted by looking4truth
Get a grip, did you actually google or yahoo search Hamza? You know he's not "just" speaking out, right? You know he really did break US and UK laws too right? You know it's not just the Us and the UK that want him in prison, France would like a go at him too, it's other muslim countries like Yemen where he's provided support to terrorists that want to get him as well? You know he fought in Afghanistan right? The goal of SOS in London is to recruit and train fighters in the UK, but you checked out that part too, right? The same cleric whose son has been jailed in Yemen for taking part in bombings?
Originally posted by looking4truth
Untill recently, you could have gone to his website www.shareeah.org... and seen some of his calls for fighting the west.
Originally posted by looking4truth
Also was the SOS newsletter that often had very interesting detailed analysis of terrorist attacks. Apearantly P.M. Tony Blair wasn't joking when he said he was going to shut down extremist websites. By the way, James Ujaama, the head of the Bly, Oregon Al-qeada camp was the former webmaster. Interesting.
Originally posted by looking4truth
What I'm saying here Subz is, you you cannot honestly use a man like Abu Hamza as an example. It has been proven time and time again that recruits going to the training camps in Afghanistan where givin special access if they came with a letter of recomendation from Hamza. Several of these are known to exist, including the one he gave James Ujaama to gain entry into the Afghan camps.
Originally posted by looking4truth
When talking about Hugo Chavez, there is enough evidence, both public and not-so public, for the U.S. to seek an indictment in US Federal court for providing material support to internationally designated terrorist groups.
Originally posted by looking4truth
I find it funny that Robertson has to apologize, he is after all a religious zealot whom most rational people pay no heed. If Pat Robertson lost two hands and an eye fighting in Afghanistan and then proceeded to start organizations like SOS to do Al-Qeada work like Abu Hamza, then I'd say go ahead and arrest him. But that's not really what he did.
Originally posted by junglejake
Where did you read that the US wants him for hate speech? I was under the impression after reading a bit that he was wanted for financing terrorist organizations.
Originally posted by Jestaman
He committed a crime! PROOF!
caselaw.lp.findlaw.com...
Misdemeanor...
caselaw.lp.findlaw.com...
Felony
Section 112. Protection of foreign officials, official guests, and internationally protected persons
(a) Whoever assaults, strikes, wounds, imprisons, or offers
violence to a foreign official, official guest, or internationally
protected person or makes any other violent attack upon the person
or liberty of such person, or, if likely to endanger his person or
liberty, makes a violent attack upon his official premises, private
accommodation, or means of transport or attempts to commit any of
the foregoing shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not
more than three years, or both. Whoever in the commission of any
such act uses a deadly or dangerous weapon, or inflicts bodily
injury, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than
ten years, or both.
(b) Whoever willfully -
(1) intimidates, coerces, threatens, or harasses a foreign
official or an official guest or obstructs a foreign official in
the performance of his duties;
[...]
d) Nothing contained in this section shall be construed or
applied so as to abridge the exercise of rights guaranteed under
the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
Section 875. Interstate communications
c) Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any
communication containing any threat to kidnap any person or any
threat to injure the person of another, shall be fined under this
title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
Originally posted by subz
Thats pretty unequivocal proof that what Robertson said was against U.S law.
(c) Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any
communication containing any threat to kidnap any person or any
threat to injure the person of another, shall be fined under this
title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
1. An expression of an intention to inflict pain, injury, evil, or punishment.
2. An indication of impending danger or harm.
3. One that is regarded as a possible danger; a menace.
Originally posted by shots
You have voted junglejake for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have used all of your votes for this month.
Way to go Jungle you hit the nail right on the head with all of your points!