It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jestaman
Republicans- SUpport killing everyone, but not abortion.(Texas wanted the SC executed for making it illegal to kill retards and little kids for strealing candy)
Democrats-Support abortion, but not the death penalty.
Republicans- Support Big Business but won't admit to it.
Democrat- Don't support the people but say they do.
Republicans- Say they are christian, but last I checked having sex with little boys/girls, animals, doing drugs, homosexual tendencies, basically anything immoral they do.
politics.abovetopsecret.com...
politics.abovetopsecret.com...
politics.abovetopsecret.com...
politics.abovetopsecret.com...
politics.abovetopsecret.com...
And last I checked not to many Liberal Priests.....
Democrats- Actually on this they aren't that bad, they support drugs/gays, so if they do that not that bad I guess, at least not hypocritical.
Look at sig for my stance.
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist06
Let me just say that we (Democrats) support MEDICAL drugs not illegal. We support people by giving them the medical help they need, not sucking their money away with WAY unfair taxes.
I mean all Democrats want to do is make it FAIR. So that when the little Republican idiots go home, they don't get away with 'stealing from poor to give to rich'.
Originally posted by The Vagabond
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist06
Let me just say that we (Democrats) support MEDICAL drugs not illegal. We support people by giving them the medical help they need, not sucking their money away with WAY unfair taxes.
Well that's a completely fair statement if I ever saw one.
*harkens to the anticipated roar of 'here-here' from everyone who has never had their taxes raised by a democrat.*
*keeps listening*
*strains*
Um... I think somebody dropped a pin.
I mean all Democrats want to do is make it FAIR. So that when the little Republican idiots go home, they don't get away with 'stealing from poor to give to rich'.
Nonsense. If there's anybody in American politics who would know fair if it reached up and ripped his family jewels off, I haven't heard of him. When did income redistribution become fair in any form, regardless of who gets it? Both parties do it. I submit to you that this past June when I was out shoveling rocks, maintaining conveyor systems, and running heavy equipment in an aggregate mine for a good wage because I'd taken the initiative to learn a trade, that it was patently unfair for even one cent of my income to be taxed and then spent on daycare subsidies for people who can't be troubled to either go out and get a real job or at least put a condom on before they screw somebody who they aren't prepared to raise a family with. What difference does it make to me whether my taxes go to them or to Dick Cheney's friends? Either way still leaves me working like a dog and taking home only about 70% of what I earned while somebody else waits at home for a check they didn't earn, compliments of good ol' hard workin', tax payin' Vagabond.
I have no problem with criticizing Republicans. I explicitly asked people what their beef with the parties is, and that's all well and good. What I'm objecting to though is that somebody could actually fall into the partisan trap and defend the man stealing from their left pocket while attacking the man who steals from their right pocket.
Originally posted by Conspiracy Theorist06
but Republicans don't tax themselves and just everyone else. So THEY have to raise the tax on the poorer people, so THEY don't have to pay.
What would you rather have? taxes to everybody? or taxes do eveyone except the richest top 2% of the untied states? (yes 2% not exagerating)
Originally posted by The Vagabond
First of all, you imply, incorrectly, that all republicans are rich. Not so. Then you apparently suggest that the richest 2% of the population aren't paying taxes. Let's see some data please.
Also, what would you propose exactly? Tax the holy hell out of the people who control the capital for business ventures? Suppose that I take out a good 30 grand in student loans to put myself through school, put in ungodly hours for years scratching my way to the top of a company by sheer wit and grit, and now at long last I'm making like $250,000 a year.
Now I've got a big choice in front of me. I'm happy where I am- I'm making plenty. But you know, if I go out on a limb and risk that money, I can start a business and god willing make a couple of million dollars so that I don't ever have to be worried about finances again, and so that my kids will absolutely go to good schools and have a shot at whatever they want to be as long as they don't blow it. Should I take the risk with my savings?
Depends how much I stand to gain. If the federal government is going to take too much of it, why should I pump capital into the economy and create jobs? I'm taking ALL of the risk, but keeping only a minority of the rewards? Forget about it.
It's not as if the democrats have never held power. The rich get richer and the poor get children no matter who the hell is in power, that much should be crystal clear to anyone who's been paying attention.
And why? Same reason for both parties. They won't let you spend your money yourself. They take your money and spend it on what they think you need, because that gives them the power, and that makes you dependent on them when election day comes.
The problem isn't that anyone isn't being taxed enough. We're all being taxed too much. The parties at some point seem to have gotten together and decided to both argue about who to tax, instead of addressing the obvious answer of cutting spending.
Big spending is a joke. We wouldn't need to argue about raising taxes on the rich to provide programs for the poor if we just cut those programs and cut the taxes across the board accordingly, because if the poor were getting to keep their incomes so that they could afford to own rather than rent they would be able to accumulate wealth, build credit, open up financial opportunities for themselves, and then they wouldn't be the poor anymore.