It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Meeting with Bush, how about a meeting with a shrink?

page: 1

log in


posted on Aug, 28 2005 @ 12:40 PM
Great article by Michael Reagan.

"Sigmund Freud had a concept he called “projection, which has been defined as a defense where the ego deals with unacceptable impulses and/or terrifying anxieties by attributing them to someone in the external world.

In many ways I think that explains the behavior of the media’s current patron saint, Cindy Sheehan, whose hate rhetoric aimed at President Bush is really meant for someone else who she can’t admit even to herself is her real target. To do so would represent one of those “unacceptable impulses” Dr. Freud was talking about.

In this case it could well be that Cindy Sheehan is projecting her rage at George Bush when the one she really despises is her late son Casey, who died as a hero in Iraq, precisely because he did die a hero in Iraq."..........

Cindy tried to stop Casey from enlisting in the military. He rejected her pleas.

Cindy tried to stop him from re-enlisting. He snubbed her again.

Cindy even tried to get him to desert and flee to Canada. He refused.

Do you really think Casey would be supporting her on this decision?

posted on Aug, 29 2005 @ 02:18 PM
Of course not, we know Casey a hell of a lot better then his mother, how could she know better then us? Jus because she raised him....

Did he know the facts? No WMDs, not a threat to the US, everything Bush&Co said being lies, so forth? Did he make his decision based on the same lies told to the Senate and the UN? If he had known the truth would he had done the same thing?

posted on Sep, 3 2005 @ 03:54 PM
That can go both ways. Bush accuses people of being traitors when he's one himself. You don't agree with him--you're a traitor!


log in