Loose Change; A Documentary on 911( no need to download), page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 28-8-2005 @ 04:01 PM by zer69



reply posted on 1-9-2005 @ 07:09 AM by aelphaeis_mangarae
911physics.co.nr...

Enter - Misc - Free Documentaries

I have Loose Change in there, as well as many other 9/11 documentaries.


reply posted on 12-9-2005 @ 05:23 AM by senseless04
Originally posted by senseless04

excellent video, and an even better soundtrack.. a must watch.

i've also posted this on my webserver. Hosted on my dsl with a max upload rate of 75k/s.

senseless.homelinux.com...
[edit on 28-8-2005 by senseless04]




I had to remove the files from my webserver because some bastard kept spam downloading. He must've downloaded each video 50 times. Sorry guys, you'll have to get it somewhere else. People piss me off.


reply posted on 12-9-2005 @ 02:30 PM by LeftBehind
Just finished watching the video.

I agree that the flashes and missile stuff were a bit of a stretch.

IMO I don't see a missile firing, or any signifigance to the flash. In some of the pictures I can't even tell what they see as strange.

The pentagon stuff they were all over the place and contradicted themselves quite a bit. One minute it's an aging fighter jet, the next minute it's a tomahawk. It seems to me that a plane definitely hit, and the evidence i've seen points to some sort of commercial airliner.

One of the problems I had with it is that they woud state things as absolute fact. They say it's impossible for one thing to happen, and yet don't give any proof towards their theories, other than a few statements here and there, usually eye witness.

They also contradict themselves about the lobby of the WTC. First they say that there was no soot, just broken windows. Then they show firemen talking about total devastation and burned bodies lying everywhere. Which one is it, hardly any damage, or enormous damage?

It definetly brought out some good questions, but the complete lack of objectivity I found annoying. You can tell that they are only interested in expressing what their view is, not in finding the truth.

I think it possible that 93 was shot down, but that cell phone faking I find too much. The article they quote says that they need at least a ten minute sample to fake voices. Where did they get the samples for those random people? Also, I have made cell phone calls from cruising planes, it's not as impossible as it sounds. Not to mention the airphones that some planes have on every seat.


So overall I found it unconvincing. The so-called squibs seem like a natural result of the unimaginable forces at play during the collapse. Blurry video and eye witness accounts may say something, but it is not definite proof.

I do agree that some things are being hidden, but concentrating on a demolition, or missile theory really does distract from the bigger issues at hand. Either way the buildings came down and it's entirely possible that the administration let it happen.


reply posted on 19-3-2006 @ 01:50 PM by iskander
Good work but the focus aspect/facts have aged, and it's much worse then that. It is the America I live in though, on and behind the screen of the that documentary.

Technically well done, and only dent I can put in is the VO to stock error, when VO references a cruise missile, VO shows Javelin launch cutting to a non related desert camo T72 explosion. Given that the external fuel tanks can and do detonate during rear aspect attacks, usually a noticeable delay time consistent with such shape charge ignitions is present.

A small inconsistency, which does not even come close to the culture corporate media fallacy and History channel type propaganda, all of which are clearly apparent to a clear mind and a seeing eye.

The real problem is with the utter destruction of American masses ability to reason and comprehend basic information patterns. Logical, critical and cognitive thinking abilities of our various social layers are continuously under coordinated attack.

Example,

By LeftBehind;

"The pentagon stuff they were all over the place and contradicted themselves quite a bit. One minute it's an aging fighter jet, the next minute it's a tomahawk."

It could be ether mental inability to follow a sentence, or most probably basic denial and inability of coping. It's the bread and butter of every advertiser, politician, charlatan, propagandist, agitator, etc and has been used since the dawn of civilisation. Add paranoia and delusions of grander and you end up with basic ingredients of a tyrannical social order.

Yea I read the rest of the post, it's typical denial. Similar to how domestic abuse victims deny the reality and continue to "love" their abusers, passionately justifying any act of violence and abuse inficted upon them.

Dear LeftBehind, you don't have to be left behind, reason does suck and it does cut both ways, but it's still much better then slavery, be it physical, economic, spiritual or mental. God be with you.

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 13 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 7 days ago with 13 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 18 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 14 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 16 hours ago, 24 flags
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 14 hours ago, 21 flags
ATS's Gutter-rats and the 90+ intro thread
  Rant, Posted 14 hours ago, 20 flags
My Brain = about to explode
  Member Art, Posted 6 hours ago, 15 flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 16 hours ago, 122 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 14 hours ago, 96 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 10 hours ago, 64 replies